Alexei reported:
After fast forwarding bpf-next today bpf_nf test started to fail when
run twice:
$ ./test_progs -t bpf_nf
#17 bpf_nf:OK
Summary: 1/10 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
$ ./test_progs -t bpf_nf
All error logs:
test_bpf_nf_ct:PASS:test_bpf_nf__open_and_load 0 nsec
test_bpf_nf_ct:PASS:iptables-legacy -t raw -A PREROUTING -j CONNMARK
--set-mark 42/0 0 nsec
(network_helpers.c:102: errno: Address already in use) Failed to bind socket
test_bpf_nf_ct:FAIL:start_server unexpected start_server: actual -1 < expected 0
#17/1 bpf_nf/xdp-ct:FAIL
test_bpf_nf_ct:PASS:test_bpf_nf__open_and_load 0 nsec
test_bpf_nf_ct:PASS:iptables-legacy -t raw -A PREROUTING -j CONNMARK
--set-mark 42/0 0 nsec
(network_helpers.c:102: errno: Address already in use) Failed to bind socket
test_bpf_nf_ct:FAIL:start_server unexpected start_server: actual -1 < expected 0
#17/2 bpf_nf/tc-bpf-ct:FAIL
#17 bpf_nf:FAIL
Summary: 0/8 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 1 FAILED
I was able to locally reproduce as well. Rearrange the connection teardown
so that the client closes its connection first so that we don't need to
linger in TCP time-wait.
Fixes: e81fbd4c1b ("selftests/bpf: Add existing connection bpf_*_ct_lookup() test")
Reported-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAADnVQ+0dnDq_v_vH1EfkacbfGnHANaon7zsw10pMb-D9FS0Pw@mail.gmail.com
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230626131942.5100-1-daniel@iogearbox.net
The recent vm image in CI has reported error in selftests that use
the iptables command. Manu Bretelle has pointed out the difference
in the recent vm image that the iptables is sym-linked to the iptables-nft.
With this knowledge, I can also reproduce the CI error by manually running
with the 'iptables-nft'.
This patch is to replace the iptables command with iptables-legacy
to unblock the CI tests.
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221012221235.3529719-1-martin.lau@linux.dev
Check properly the connection tracking entry status configured running
bpf_ct_change_status kfunc.
Remove unnecessary IPS_CONFIRMED status configuration since it is
already done during entry allocation.
Fixes: 6eb7fba007 ("selftests/bpf: Add tests for new nf_conntrack kfuncs")
Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/813a5161a71911378dfac8770ec890428e4998aa.1662623574.git.lorenzo@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Test that the prog can read from the connection mark. This test is nice
because it ensures progs can interact with netfilter subsystem
correctly.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Xu <dxu@dxuuu.xyz>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/d3bc620a491e4c626c20d80631063922cbe13e2b.1660254747.git.dxu@dxuuu.xyz
Add a test where we do a conntrack lookup on an existing connection.
This is nice because it's a more realistic test than artifically
creating a ct entry and looking it up afterwards.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Xu <dxu@dxuuu.xyz>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/de5a617832f38f8b5631cc87e2a836da7c94d497.1660254747.git.dxu@dxuuu.xyz
Test cases we care about and ensure improper usage is caught and
rejected by the verifier.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220721134245.2450-13-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
bpf_prog_test_run is being deprecated in favor of the OPTS-based
bpf_prog_test_run_opts.
We end up unable to use CHECK in most cases, so replace usages with
ASSERT_* calls.
Signed-off-by: Delyan Kratunov <delyank@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220202235423.1097270-2-delyank@fb.com
This tests that we return errors as documented, and also that the kfunc
calls work from both XDP and TC hooks.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220114163953.1455836-8-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
