Now that we've eliminated INTEL_GEN(), IS_GEN_RANGE(), etc. from the
display code, we should also kill off our use of the IS_GEN9_* macros
too. We'll do the conversion manually this time instead of using
Coccinelle since the most logical substitution can depend heavily on the
code context, and sometimes we can keep the code simpler if we make
additional adjustments such as swapping the order of if/else arms.
v2:
- Restore a lost negation in intel_pll_is_valid().
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Radhakrishna Sripada <radhakrishna.sripada@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210407203945.1432531-1-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
(cherry picked from commit 70bfb30743)
[Jani: cherry picked to topic branch to reduce conflicts]
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Display features should not be initialized or de-initialized when there
is no display. Skip modeset initialization, output setup, plane, crtc,
encoder, connector registration, display cdclk and rawclk
initialization, display core initialization, etc.
Skip the functionality at as high level as possible, and remove any
redundant checks. If the functionality is conditional to *other* display
checks, do not add more. If the un-initialization has checks for
initialization, do not add more.
We explicitly do not care about any GMCH/VLV/CHV code paths, as they've
always had and will have display.
Reviewed-by: Radhakrishna Sripada <radhakrishna.sripada@intel.com>
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210408203150.237947-3-jose.souza@intel.com
Now that we've eliminated INTEL_GEN(), IS_GEN_RANGE(), etc. from the
display code, we should also kill off our use of the IS_GEN9_* macros
too. We'll do the conversion manually this time instead of using
Coccinelle since the most logical substitution can depend heavily on the
code context, and sometimes we can keep the code simpler if we make
additional adjustments such as swapping the order of if/else arms.
v2:
- Restore a lost negation in intel_pll_is_valid().
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Radhakrishna Sripada <radhakrishna.sripada@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210407203945.1432531-1-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
Add the check if source control mode is supported by the
PCON, before starting configuring PCON for FRL training,
as per spec VESA DP2.0-HDMI2.1 PCON Draft-1 Sec-7.
v2: Added spec details for the change. (Uma)
Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210323112422.1211-3-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com
Currently the FRL training mode (Concurrent, Sequential) and
training type (Normal, Extended) are not defined properly and
are passed as bool values in drm_helpers for pcon
configuration for FRL training.
This patch:
-Add register masks for Sequential and Normal FRL training options.
-Fixes the drm_helpers for FRL Training configuration to use the
appropriate masks.
-Modifies the calls to the above drm_helpers in i915/intel_dp as per
the above change.
v2: Re-used the register masks for these options, instead of enum. (Ville)
Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210323112422.1211-2-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com
Use Coccinelle to convert most of the usage of INTEL_GEN() and IS_GEN()
in the display code to use DISPLAY_VER() comparisons instead. The
following semantic patch was used:
@@ expression dev_priv, E; @@
- INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) == E
+ IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, E)
@@ expression dev_priv; @@
- INTEL_GEN(dev_priv)
+ DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv)
@@ expression dev_priv; expression E; @@
- IS_GEN(dev_priv, E)
+ IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, E)
@@
expression dev_priv;
expression from, until;
@@
- IS_GEN_RANGE(dev_priv, from, until)
+ IS_DISPLAY_RANGE(dev_priv, from, until)
There are still some display-related uses of INTEL_GEN() in intel_pm.c
(watermark code) and i915_irq.c. Those will be updated separately.
v2:
- Use new IS_DISPLAY_RANGE and IS_DISPLAY_VER helpers. (Jani)
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210320044245.3920043-4-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
ILK is the only platform that we consider "gen5" and SNB is the only
platform we consider "gen6." Add an IS_SANDYBRIDGE() macro and then
replace numeric platform tests for these two generations with direct
platform tests with the following Coccinelle semantic patch:
@@ expression dev_priv; @@
- IS_GEN(dev_priv, 5)
+ IS_IRONLAKE(dev_priv)
@@ expression dev_priv; @@
- IS_GEN(dev_priv, 6)
+ IS_SANDYBRIDGE(dev_priv)
@@ expression dev_priv; @@
- IS_GEN_RANGE(dev_priv, 5, 6)
+ IS_IRONLAKE(dev_priv) || IS_SANDYBRIDGE(dev_priv)
This will simplify our upcoming patches which eliminate INTEL_GEN()
usage in the display code.
v2:
- Reverse ilk/snb order for IS_GEN_RANGE conversion. (Ville)
- Rebase + regenerate from semantic patch
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210320044245.3920043-2-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
Move the g4x+ DP code into a new file. This will leave mostly
platform agnostic code in intel_dp.c. Well, the misplaced phy
test stuff pretty much ruins that, but let's squint real hard
for now.
v2: Add comment exlaining which platforms are covered (Daniel)
Leave intel_dp_unused_lane_mask() be since it is pretty generic
Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210318161015.22070-6-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
By the specification the 0xF0000-0xF02FF range is only valid when the
DPCD revision is 1.4 or higher. Disable LTTPR support if this isn't so.
Trying to detect LTTPRs returned corrupted values for the above DPCD
range at least on a Skylake host with an LG 43UD79-B monitor with a DPCD
revision 1.2 connected.
v2: Add the actual version check.
v3: Fix s/DRPX/DPRX/ typo.
Fixes: 7b2a4ab8b0 ("drm/i915: Switch to LTTPR transparent mode link training")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.11
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210317190149.4032966-1-imre.deak@intel.com
Remove code for resetting frl related members from intel_disable_dp, as
this is not applicable for older platforms.
Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210309043915.1921-3-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com
In the case of MSO (Multi-SST Operation), the EDID contains the timings
for a single panel segment. We'll want to hide the fact from userspace,
and expose modes that span the entire display.
Don't modify the EDID, as the userspace should not use that for
modesetting, only modify the actual modes.
v3: Use pixel overlap if available.
v2: Rename intel_dp_mso_mode_fixup -> intel_edp_mso_mode_fixup
Cc: Nischal Varide <nischal.varide@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/2862284eb033bb0ffc96134b7d5b11bf29e4587f.1614682842.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
Read and debug log the eDP sink MSO configuration. Do not actually do
anything with the information yet besides logging.
FIXME: The pixel overlap is present in DisplayID 2.0, but we don't have
parsing for that. Assume zero for now. We could also add quirks for
non-zero pixel overlap before DisplayID 2.0 parsing.
v3: Add placeholder for pixel overlap.
v2: Rename intel_dp_mso_init -> intel_edp_mso_init
Cc: Nischal Varide <nischal.varide@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/24ef61574e5af12cd86d5b85afbfbd4ac2f9de25.1613054234.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
If source_support is set the platform supports PSR so no need to check
it again at every CAN_PSR().
Also removing the intel_dp_is_edp() calls, if sink_support is set
the sink connected is for sure a eDP panel.
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210209181439.215104-3-jose.souza@intel.com
It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and
DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder
supportable PSR.
And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to
intel_dp's intel_psr structure.
It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting
multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of
enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with
a single transcoder PSR case yet.
v2: Fix indentation and add comments
v3: Remove Blank line
v4: Rebased
v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment.
- Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector()
v6: Address Anshuman's review comments
- Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of
a single pipe PSR
v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder
PSR on BDW+
v8: Address Anshuman's review comments
- Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn()
v9: Fix commit message
v10: Rebased
v11: Address Jose's review comment.
- Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl().
- In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private.
- Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR.
v12: Address Jose's review comment.
- Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into
commit_pipe_config().
- Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original
on i915_psr_sink_status_show().
- Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function.
- In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on
intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder.
- Add an whitespace to comments.
v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment.
- Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro.
- In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe,
fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush().
- Remove redundant or unneeded codes.
- Update comments.
v14: Address Jose's review comment
- Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and
for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro.
- Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure.
- Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support.
- Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from
psr_compute_config().
- Remove redundant or unneeded codes.
v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from
intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl()
Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com>
Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
This forces a complete modeset if vrr drm crtc state goes
from enabled to disabled and vice versa.
This patch also computes vrr state variables from the mode timings
and based on the vrr property set by userspace as well as hardware's
vrr capability.
v2:
*Rebase
v3:
* Vmin = max (vtotal, vmin) (Manasi)
v4:
* set crtc_state->vrr.enable = 0 for disable request
v5:
* drm_dbg_kms, squash crtc states def patch (Jani N)
v6:
* Move vrr modeset check to separate function (Jani N)
v7:
* Ville's fixes - vmin, vmax rename, fix rounding dir
* Add pipeline full, flipline to crtc state
* Pass conn state to vrr_compute_config (Ville)
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210122232647.22688-6-manasi.d.navare@intel.com
This function sets the VRR property for connector based
on the platform support, EDID monitor range and DP sink
DPCD capability of outputing video without msa
timing information.
v8:
* Use HAS_VRR, remove drm_conn declaration (Jani N)
* Fix typos in Comment (Jani N)
v7:
* Move the helper to separate file (Manasi)
v6:
* Remove unset of prop
v5:
* Fix the vrr prop not being set in kernel (Manasi)
* Unset the prop on connector disconnect (Manasi)
v4:
* Rebase (Mansi)
v3:
* intel_dp_is_vrr_capable can be used for debugfs, make it
non static (Manasi)
v2:
* Just set this in intel_dp_get_modes instead of new hook (Jani)
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Aditya Swarup <aditya.swarup@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210122232647.22688-2-manasi.d.navare@intel.com
Split out the DP aux functionality to a new intel_dp_aux.[ch]. This is a
surprisingly clean cut.
v2:
- Remove intel_dp_pack_aux declaration from intel_dp.h (Anshuman)
- Fixed some whitespace/comment checkpatch warnings
Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210120101834.19813-4-jani.nikula@intel.com
This reverts commit 0883ce8146. Originally
these quirks were added because of the issues with using the eDP
backlight interfaces on certain laptop panels, which made it impossible
to properly probe for DPCD backlight support without having a whitelist
for panels that we know have working VESA backlight control interfaces
over DPCD. As well, it should be noted it was impossible to use the
normal sink OUI for recognizing these panels as none of them actually
filled out their OUIs, hence needing to resort to checking EDIDs.
At the time we weren't really sure why certain panels had issues with
DPCD backlight controls, but we eventually figured out that there was a
second interface that these problematic laptop panels actually did work
with and advertise properly: Intel's proprietary backlight interface for
HDR panels. So far the testing we've done hasn't brought any panels to
light that advertise this interface and don't support it properly, which
means we finally have a real solution to this problem.
As a result, we now have no need for the force DPCD backlight quirk, and
furthermore this also removes the need for any kind of EDID quirk
checking in DRM. So, let's just revert it for now since we were the only
driver using this.
v3:
* Rebase
v2:
* Fix indenting error picked up by checkpatch in
intel_edp_init_connector()
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: thaytan@noraisin.net
Cc: Vasily Khoruzhick <anarsoul@gmail.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210114221709.2261452-6-lyude@redhat.com
I accidentally added the compliance test hacks only to
intel_dp_hotplug() which doesn't even get used on any DDI
platform. Put the same crap into intel_ddi_hotplug().
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Fixes: 193af12cd6 ("drm/i915: Shove the PHY test into the hotplug work")
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210114205046.8247-7-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Currently we claim to use TPS7 when using TPS4. That is just
confusing, so let's fix the debug print.
And while we're touching this let's add the customary
encoder id/name as well.
v2: Add MISSING_CASE() (Manasi)
Reviewed-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210114205046.8247-2-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c:6922 intel_dp_update_420() warn: should this be a bitwise op?
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c:6922 intel_dp_update_420() warn: should this be a bitwise op?
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c:6923 intel_dp_update_420() warn: should this be a bitwise op?
Inside drm_dp_downstream_rgb_to_ycbcr_conversion(), that parameter
'color_spc' is used as return port_cap[3] & color_spc, implying that it
is indeed a mask and not a boolean value.
Fixes: 522508b665 ("drm/i915/display: Let PCON convert from RGB to YCbCr if it can")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
Cc: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201223103917.14687-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Add an "encoder reset" call to hide some more pps functions, and clean
up the callers. A minor functional change is not holding the pps lock
across the whole operation in intel_dp_encoder_reset, but instead doing
it in two steps.
v2: rename intel_pps_reinit to intel_pps_encoder_reset for clarity
Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/84a50f2700b19c6719cd3e1e931c64f1e2027551.1610127741.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
In a long overdue refactoring, split out all panel sequencer code from
intel_dp.c to new intel_pps.[ch].
The first part is mostly just code movement as-is, without cleanups or
functional changes.
We need to add a vlv_get_dpll() helper to get at the vlv/chv dpll from
pps code.
v2: Rebase.
Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/14cc59d5734432ad976cd49ff8efce8fa413e5b2.1610127741.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
The DP PHY vswing/pre-emphasis level programming the driver does is
related to the DPTX -> first LTTPR link segment only. Accordingly it
should be only programmed when link training the first LTTPR and kept
as-is when training subsequent LTTPRs and the DPRX. For these latter
PHYs the vs/pe levels will be set in response to writing the
DP_TRAINING_LANEx_SET_PHY_REPEATERy DPCD registers (by an upstream LTTPR
TX PHY snooping this write access of its downstream LTTPR/DPRX RX PHY).
The above is also described in DP Standard v2.0 under 3.6.6.1.
While at it simplify and add the LTTPR that is link trained to the debug
message in intel_dp_set_signal_levels().
Fixes: b30edfd8d0 ("drm/i915: Switch to LTTPR non-transparent mode link training")
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201229172201.4155327-2-imre.deak@intel.com
Handle CP_IRQ in DEVICE_SERVICE_IRQ_VECTOR_ESI0
It requires to call intel_hdcp_handle_cp_irq() in case
of CP_IRQ is triggered by a sink in DP-MST topology.
Cc: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c@intel.com>
Tested-by: Karthik B S <karthik.b.s@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210111081120.28417-4-anshuman.gupta@intel.com
Some new eDP panels don't like to operate at the max parameters, and
instead we need to go for an optimal confiugration. That unfortunately
doesn't work with older eDP panels which are generally only guaranteed
to work at the max parameters.
To solve these two conflicting requirements let's start with the optimal
setup, and if that fails we start again with the max parameters. The
downside is probably an extra modeset when we switch strategies but
I don't see a good way to avoid that.
For a bit of history we first tried to go for the fast+narrow in
commit 7769db5883 ("drm/i915/dp: optimize eDP 1.4+ link config
fast and narrow"). but that had to be reverted due to regression
on older panels in commit f11cb1c19a ("drm/i915/dp: revert back
to max link rate and lane count on eDP"). So now we try to get
the best of both worlds by using both strategies.
v2: Deal with output_bpp and uapi vs. hw state split
Reword some comments
v3: Rebase
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Albert Astals Cid <aacid@kde.org> # v5.0 backport
Cc: Emanuele Panigati <ilpanich@gmail.com> # v5.0 backport
Cc: Matteo Iervasi <matteoiervasi@gmail.com> # v5.0 backport
Cc: Timo Aaltonen <tjaalton@ubuntu.com>
Cc: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105267
References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109959
References: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/272
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210107182026.24848-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
