Similarly to "libbfd", add a "llvm" feature to the output of command
"bpftool version" to indicate that LLVM is used for disassembling JIT-ed
programs. This feature is mutually exclusive (from Makefile definitions)
with "libbfd".
Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com>
Tested-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund@corigine.com>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221025150329.97371-9-quentin@isovalent.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
To help users check what version of libbpf is being used with bpftool,
print the number along with bpftool's own version number.
Output:
$ ./bpftool version
./bpftool v5.16.0
using libbpf v0.7
features: libbfd, libbpf_strict, skeletons
$ ./bpftool version --json --pretty
{
"version": "5.16.0",
"libbpf_version": "0.7",
"features": {
"libbfd": true,
"libbpf_strict": true,
"skeletons": true
}
}
Note that libbpf does not expose its patch number.
Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220210104237.11649-2-quentin@isovalent.com
Most files in the kernel repository have a SPDX tags. The files that
don't have such a tag (or another license boilerplate) tend to fall
under the GPL-2.0 license. In the past, bpftool's Makefile (for example)
has been marked as GPL-2.0 for that reason, when in fact all bpftool is
dual-licensed.
To prevent a similar confusion from happening with the RST documentation
files for bpftool, let's explicitly mark all files as dual-licensed.
Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211115225844.33943-2-quentin@isovalent.com
Otherwise, attaching with bpftool doesn't work with strict section names.
Also:
- Add --legacy option to switch back to pre-1.0 behavior
- Print a warning when program fails to load in strict mode to
point to --legacy flag
- By default, don't append / to the section name; in strict
mode it's relevant only for a small subset of prog types
+ bpftool --legacy prog loadall tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_cgroup_link.o /sys/fs/bpf/kprobe type kprobe
libbpf: failed to pin program: File exists
Error: failed to pin all programs
+ bpftool prog loadall tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_cgroup_link.o /sys/fs/bpf/kprobe type kprobe
v1 -> v2:
- strict by default (Quentin Monnet)
- add more info to --legacy description (Quentin Monnet)
- add bash completion (Quentin Monnet)
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Reviewed-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211110192324.920934-1-sdf@google.com
Nearly all man pages for bpftool have the same common set of option
flags (--help, --version, --json, --pretty, --debug). The description is
duplicated across all the pages, which is more difficult to maintain if
the description of an option changes. It may also be confusing to sort
out what options are not "common" and should not be copied when creating
new manual pages.
Let's move the description for those common options to a separate file,
which is included with a RST directive when generating the man pages.
Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200909162500.17010-3-quentin@isovalent.com
