Function in modules could appear in /proc/kallsyms in random order.
ffffffffa02608a0 t bpf_testmod_loop_test
ffffffffa02600c0 t __traceiter_bpf_testmod_test_writable_bare
ffffffffa0263b60 d __tracepoint_bpf_testmod_test_write_bare
ffffffffa02608c0 T bpf_testmod_test_read
ffffffffa0260d08 t __SCT__tp_func_bpf_testmod_test_writable_bare
ffffffffa0263300 d __SCK__tp_func_bpf_testmod_test_read
ffffffffa0260680 T bpf_testmod_test_write
ffffffffa0260860 t bpf_testmod_test_mod_kfunc
Therefore, we cannot reliably use kallsyms_find_next() to find the end of
a function. Replace it with a simple guess (start + 128). This is good
enough for this test.
Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211022234814.318457-1-songliubraving@fb.com
Skipping the second half of the test is not enough to silent the warning
in dmesg. Skip the whole test before we can either properly silent the
warning in kernel, or fix LBR snapshot for VM.
Fixes: 025bd7c753 ("selftests/bpf: Add test for bpf_get_branch_snapshot")
Fixes: aa67fdb464 ("selftests/bpf: Skip the second half of get_branch_snapshot in vm")
Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211026000733.477714-1-songliubraving@fb.com
VMs running on upstream 5.12+ kernel support LBR. However,
bpf_get_branch_snapshot couldn't stop the LBR before too many entries
are flushed. Skip the hit/waste test for VMs before we find a proper fix
for LBR in VM.
Fixes: 025bd7c753 ("selftests/bpf: Add test for bpf_get_branch_snapshot")
Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211007050231.728496-1-songliubraving@fb.com
Cleanup code uses while (cpu++ < cpu_cnt) for closing fds, which means
it starts iterating from 1 for closing fds. If the first fd is -1, it
skips over it and closes garbage fds (typically zero) in the remaining
array. This leads to test failures for future tests when they end up
storing fd 0 (as the slot becomes free due to close(0)) in ldimm64's BTF
fd, ending up trying to match module BTF id with vmlinux.
This was observed as spurious CI failure for the ksym_module_libbpf and
module_attach tests. The test ends up closing fd 0 and breaking libbpf's
assumption that module BTF fd will always be > 0, which leads to the
kernel thinking that we are pointing to a BTF ID in vmlinux BTF.
Fixes: 025bd7c753 (selftests/bpf: Add test for bpf_get_branch_snapshot)
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210927145941.1383001-12-memxor@gmail.com
This test uses bpf_get_branch_snapshot from a fexit program. The test uses
a target function (bpf_testmod_loop_test) and compares the record against
kallsyms. If there isn't enough record matching kallsyms, the test fails.
Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210910183352.3151445-4-songliubraving@fb.com
