b6ff30849c
This commit adds comments that label the MP tests' producer and consumer processes, and also that label the "exists" clause as the bad outcome. Reported-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
39 lines
870 B
Text
39 lines
870 B
Text
C MP+porevlocks
|
|
|
|
(*
|
|
* Result: Never
|
|
*
|
|
* This litmus test demonstrates how lock acquisitions and releases can
|
|
* stand in for smp_load_acquire() and smp_store_release(), respectively.
|
|
* In other words, when holding a given lock (or indeed after releasing a
|
|
* given lock), a CPU is not only guaranteed to see the accesses that other
|
|
* CPUs made while previously holding that lock, it is also guaranteed to
|
|
* see all prior accesses by those other CPUs.
|
|
*)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
spinlock_t mylock;
|
|
int buf;
|
|
int flag;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
P0(int *buf, int *flag, spinlock_t *mylock) // Consumer
|
|
{
|
|
int r0;
|
|
int r1;
|
|
|
|
r0 = READ_ONCE(*flag);
|
|
spin_lock(mylock);
|
|
r1 = READ_ONCE(*buf);
|
|
spin_unlock(mylock);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
P1(int *buf, int *flag, spinlock_t *mylock) // Producer
|
|
{
|
|
spin_lock(mylock);
|
|
WRITE_ONCE(*buf, 1);
|
|
spin_unlock(mylock);
|
|
WRITE_ONCE(*flag, 1);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
exists (0:r0=1 /\ 0:r1=0) (* Bad outcome. *)
|