1
0
Fork 0
mirror of synced 2025-03-06 20:59:54 +01:00
linux/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/map_ptr.c
Alexei Starovoitov c67cae551f bpf: Tighten ptr_to_btf_id checks.
The networking programs typically don't require CAP_PERFMON, but through kfuncs
like bpf_cast_to_kern_ctx() they can access memory through PTR_TO_BTF_ID. In
such case enforce CAP_PERFMON.
Also make sure that only GPL programs can access kernel data structures.
All kfuncs require GPL already.

Also remove allow_ptr_to_map_access. It's the same as allow_ptr_leaks and
different name for the same check only causes confusion.

Fixes: fd264ca020 ("bpf: Add a kfunc to type cast from bpf uapi ctx to kernel ctx")
Fixes: 50c6b8a9ae ("selftests/bpf: Add a test for btf_type_tag "percpu"")
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221125220617.26846-1-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
2022-11-30 15:33:48 -08:00

99 lines
2.9 KiB
C

{
"bpf_map_ptr: read with negative offset rejected",
.insns = {
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_10),
BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_1, -8),
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.fixup_map_array_48b = { 1 },
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
.errstr_unpriv = "access is allowed only to CAP_PERFMON and CAP_SYS_ADMIN",
.result = REJECT,
.errstr = "R1 is bpf_array invalid negative access: off=-8",
},
{
"bpf_map_ptr: write rejected",
.insns = {
BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0),
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2, 0),
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.fixup_map_array_48b = { 3 },
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
.errstr_unpriv = "access is allowed only to CAP_PERFMON and CAP_SYS_ADMIN",
.result = REJECT,
.errstr = "only read from bpf_array is supported",
},
{
"bpf_map_ptr: read non-existent field rejected",
.insns = {
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_6, 0),
BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_1, 1),
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.fixup_map_array_48b = { 1 },
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
.errstr_unpriv = "access is allowed only to CAP_PERFMON and CAP_SYS_ADMIN",
.result = REJECT,
.errstr = "cannot access ptr member ops with moff 0 in struct bpf_map with off 1 size 4",
.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"bpf_map_ptr: read ops field accepted",
.insns = {
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_6, 0),
BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_1, 0),
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.fixup_map_array_48b = { 1 },
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
.errstr_unpriv = "access is allowed only to CAP_PERFMON and CAP_SYS_ADMIN",
.result = ACCEPT,
.retval = 1,
},
{
"bpf_map_ptr: r = 0, map_ptr = map_ptr + r",
.insns = {
BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0),
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0),
BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.fixup_map_hash_16b = { 4 },
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
.errstr_unpriv = "R1 has pointer with unsupported alu operation",
.result = ACCEPT,
},
{
"bpf_map_ptr: r = 0, r = r + map_ptr",
.insns = {
BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0),
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 0),
BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_0, 0),
BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0),
BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.fixup_map_hash_16b = { 4 },
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
.errstr_unpriv = "R0 has pointer with unsupported alu operation",
.result = ACCEPT,
},