If the panel supports VRR it must be capable of accepting
timings with arbitrary vblank length, within the valid VRR
range. Use that fact to allow the user to request any refresh
rate they like. We simply pick the next highest fixed mode
from our list, and adjust the vblank to get the desired refresh
rate in the end.
Of course currently everything to do with the vrefresh is
using 1Hz precision, so might not be exact. But we can improve
that in the future by just upping our vrefresh precision.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230404175431.23064-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Mitul Golani <mitulkumar.ajitkumar.golani@intel.com>
It's a bit confusing to have two cached EDIDs in struct intel_connector
with slightly different purposes. Make the distinction a bit clearer by
moving the EDID cached for eDP and LVDS panels at connector init time to
struct intel_panel, and name it fixed_edid. That's what it is, a fixed
EDID for the panels.
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/328350ef918638928a8286cdbab3107c8258332d.1674643465.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
Currently on bxt/glk we just grab the power sequencer index from
the VBT data even though it may not have been parsed yet. That
could lead us to using the incorrect power sequencer during the
initial panel probe.
To avoid that let's try to read out the current state of the
power sequencer from the hardware. Unfortunately the power
sequencer no longer has anything in its registers to associate
it with the port, so the best we can do is just iterate through
the power sequencers and pick the first one. This should be
sufficient for single panel cases.
For the dual panel cases we probably need to go back to
parsing the VBT before the panel probe (and hope that
panel_type=0xff is never a thing in those cases). To that
end the code always prefers the VBT panel sequencer, if
available.
v2: Restructure a bit for upcoming icp+ dual PPS support
Cc: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221125173156.31689-5-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
Lots of ADL machines out there with bogus VBTs that declare
two eDP child devices. In order for those to work we need to
figure out which power sequencer to use before we try the EDID
read. So let's do the panel VBT init early if we can, falling
back to the post-EDID init otherwise.
The post-EDID init panel_type=0xff approach of assuming the
power sequencer should already be enabled doesn't really work
with multiple eDP panels, and currently we just end up using
the same power sequencer for both eDP ports, which at least
confuses the wakeref tracking, and potentially also causes us
to toggle the VDD for the panel when we should not.
Cc: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221125173156.31689-3-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Introduce a place where we can initialize connector->panel
after it's been allocated. We already have a intel_panel_init()
so had to get creative with the name and came up with
intel_panel_init_alloc().
Cc: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221125173156.31689-2-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Turns out many of the files that need i915_reg.h get it implicitly via
{display/intel_de.h, gt/intel_context.h} -> i915_trace.h -> i915_irq.h
-> i915_reg.h. Since i915_trace.h doesn't actually need i915_irq.h,
makes sense to drop it, but that requires adding quite a few new
includes all over the place.
Prefer including i915_reg.h where needed instead of adding another
implicit include, because eventually we'll want to split up i915_reg.h
and only include the specific registers at each place.
Also some places actually needed i915_irq.h too.
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/6e78a2e0ac1bffaf5af3b5ccc21dff05e6518cef.1668008071.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
Since commit a5810f551d ("drm/i915: Allow more varied alternate
fixed modes for panels") intel_panel_add_edid_alt_fixed_modes()
no longer considers vrr vs. drrs separately. So no reason to
pass them as separate parameters either.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220927180615.25476-2-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Add a function to get the fixed_mode with the highest clock.
The plan is to use this for the link bw calculation on seamless
DRRS panels so that we alwasy end up with the same link params
regardless of the requested refresh rate. This will allow fastset
to do seamless refresh rate changes based on userspace request
instead of having to go for a full modeset.
TODO: the function name isn't great
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220907091057.11572-15-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
On some systems the panel reports alternate modes with
different blanking periods. If the EDID reports them and VBT
doesn't tell us otherwise then I can't really see why they
should be rejected. So allow their use for the purposes of
static DRRS.
For seamless DRRS we still require a much more exact match
of course. But that logic only kicks in when selecting the
downclock mode (or in the future when determining whether
we can do a seamless refresh rate change due to a user
modeset).
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/6374
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220830212436.2021-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
It seem that when dealing with VRR capable eDP panels we need
to accept fixed modes with variable vblank length (which is what
VRR varies dynamically). Typically the preferred mode seems to be
a non-VRR more (lowish dotclock/refresh rate + short vblank).
We also have examples where it looks like even the hblank length
is a bit different between the preferred mode vs. VRR mode(s).
So let's just accept anything that has matching hdisp+vdisp+flags.
v2: Document that is_alt_drrs_mode() is a subset of is_alt_vrr_mode() (Jani)
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/125
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220531191844.11313-4-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Move the panel specific VBT parsing to happen during the
output probing stage. Needs to be done because the VBT
parsing will need to look at the EDID to determine
the correct panel_type on some machines.
We split the parsed VBT data (i915->vbt) along the same
boundary. For the moment we just hoist all the panel
specific stuff into connector->panel.vbt since that seems
like the most convenient place for eg. the backlight code.
Note that we simply drop the drrs type check from
intel_drrs_frontbuffer_update() since that operates on the whole
device rather than a specific connector/encoder. But the check
was just a micro optimization so removing it doesn't actually
mattter for correctness.
TODO: Lot's of cleanup to be done in the future. Eg. most of
the DSI stuff could probably be eliminated entirely and just
parsed on demand during DSI init.
v2: Note the intel_drrs_frontbuffer_update() change
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220510104242.6099-13-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
We shouldn't restrict ourselves to just downclock modes with
lower refresh rate than the preferred mode. Laptops these
days can offer higher refresh rate modes as well.
Remove the arbitrary limit and allow all modes that, apart
from the clock, match the preferred mode.
v2: s/add_edid_downclock_modes/add_edid_alt_fixed_modes/ (Jani)
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220331112822.11462-9-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Instead of duplicating the fixed/downclock modes we can just grab
the originals straight from the probed_modes list and keep them.
The next .get_modes() is going to repopulate the probed_modes list
anyway so whatever we leave there is just going to sit around until
that time wasting memory. In fact let's clear out the probed modes
list entirely to make sure we get 100% consistent behaviour starting
already from the very first real .get_modes().
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220331112822.11462-7-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
The intel_panel_add_edid_fixed_mode() vs.
intel_panel_add_edid_downclock_mode() split is not really
helpful. Let's just roll those into a single function so
that the connector init code doesn't have to care too much
about this. All we need to know is whether DRRS should be
allowed or not.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220331112822.11462-6-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
intel_drrs_init() is a mostly pointless wrapper around
intel_panel_add_edid_downclock_mode(), get rid of it.
The only really useful thing left in there is the debug
print regarding the DRRS type supported by the connector.
Let's just move that into intel_panel_init().
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220331112822.11462-5-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
All the non-EDID fixed mode functions basically do the exact
same thing. Let's refactor the common bits into a shared
function.
There are minor differences on how the mode types are populated,
whether the display info physical size is updated, and the debug
print. The differences are purely accidental, so unifying them is
actually a good thing.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220331112822.11462-4-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Rather than having the connector init get the fixed mode back from
intel_panel and then feed it straight back into intel_panel_init()
let's just make the fixed mode lookup put the mode directly onto
the panel's fixed_modes list. Avoids the pointless round trip and
opens the door for further enhancements to the fixed mode handling.
v2: Make the debug message correct by using intel_panel_drrs_type() (Jani)
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220331112822.11462-3-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Apart from the EDID and VBT based mechanism we also sometimes
use the encoder's current mode as the panel fixed mode. We
currently have the same code for that duplicated in two places.
Let's unify.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220323182935.4701-8-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Rename intel_panel_vbt_fixed_mode() to
intel_panel_vbt_lfp_fixed_mode() to be more descriptive.
We'll have another VBT fixed mode function soon and we
don't want to confuse the two.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220323182935.4701-6-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Replace all drm_mode_debug_printmodeline() calls with
DRM_MODE_FMT+DRM_MODE_ARG(). Makes the debug output a bit more
terse in places where we previously had a newline in the precedeing
drm_dbg_kms(), and avoids anything else sneaking in between the two
printk()s in all cases.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220323182935.4701-3-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Store the fixed_mode and downclock_mode as a real list,
in preparation for exposing other supported modes as well.
v2: Init the list in intel_sdvo_connector_alloc() too
v3: Use list_first_entry_or_null() (Jani)
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220314152737.9125-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Let's start supporting static DRRS by trying to match the refresh
rate the user has requested, assuming the panel supports suitable
timings.
For now we stick to just our current two timings:
- fixed_mode: the panel's preferred mode
- downclock_mode: the lowest refresh rate mode we found
Some panels may support more timings than that, but we'll
have to convert our fixed_mode/downclock_mode pointers
into a full list before we can handle that.
v2: Rebase due to intel_panel_get_modes()
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> #v1
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220311172428.14685-16-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
There are a couple of cases where we essentially just want to
get/check the preferred fixed mode of the panel. Add a small
helper for that to abstract away the direct pointer lookup.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220311172428.14685-9-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Abstract away the details on where we store the fixed/downclock
modes, and also how we select them. Will be useful for static
DRRS (aka. allowing the user to select the refresh rate for the
panel).
We pass in the user requested mode to intel_panel_fixed_mode()
so that in the future it may try to match the refresh rate.
And intel_panel_downclock_mode() gets passed the adjusted_mode
we actually chose to use so that it may find a suitable lower
resresh rate variant.
v2: Hook it up for all encoders
s/fixed_mode/adjusted_mode/ in intel_panel_downclock_mode() (Jani)
Elaborate on the choice or arguments for the functions (Jani)
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220311172428.14685-7-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Instead of just having the pipe_src_{w,h} let's use a full
drm_rect for it. This will be particularly useful to astract
away some bigjoiner details.
v2: No hweight() stuff yet
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220223131315.18016-11-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
When using a panel with a fixed mode we don't change the refresh
rate of the display. Reject any user requested mode which doesn't
match that fixed refresh rate.
Unfortunately when Xorg sees the scaling_mode property on the
connecor it likes to automagically cook up modes whose refresh
rate is a fair bit off from the fixed refresh rate we use. So
we have to give it some extra latitude so that we don't start to
reject all of it.
v2: sDVO now uses intel_panel_compute_config() too
v3: Add a debug message to inform the user what happened
References: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/2939
References: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/3969
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210929184536.8332-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Let's introduce a compute_config() helper for fixed mode panels.
For now all it does is the fixed_mode->adjusted_mode copy.
Note that with sDVO we have to ask the external encoder chip
to spit out our actual display timings for us, so the fixed_mode
to adjusted_mode copy done by intel_panel_compute_config() is
redundant, but we still want to use it to do other checks for us
later. We'll be fine so long as we only call it before
intel_sdvo_get_preferred_input_mode() overwrites adjusted_mode
with the timings from the encoder.
v2: Use intel_panel_compute_config() with sDVO
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210927185207.13620-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
When using a fixed mode we won't change the refresh rate ever.
So filter out all modes that don't match the fixed_mode's refresh
rate.
I'm going to declare the "rounded to nearest Hz refresh
rates must match" approach good enough for now.
Note that we could start supporting multiple refresh rates
with panels that can do it, but that would mean replacing
the single fixed mode concept with a list of fixed modes.
Then we could look for the closest match to the user's
requested refresh rate and use that. But all of that would
be a fair bit of work so we'll leave it for later.
References: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/2939
References: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/3969
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210923200109.4459-4-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Hoist the intel_de.h include from intel_display_types.h one
level up. I need this in order to untangle the include order
so that I can add tracepoints into intel_de.h.
This little cocci script did most of the work for me:
@find@
@@
(
intel_de_read(...)
|
intel_de_read_fw(...)
|
intel_de_write(...)
|
intel_de_write_fw(...)
)
@has_include@
@@
(
#include "intel_de.h"
|
#include "display/intel_de.h"
)
@depends on find && !has_include@
@@
+ #include "intel_de.h"
#include "intel_display_types.h"
@depends on find && !has_include@
@@
+ #include "display/intel_de.h"
#include "display/intel_display_types.h"
Cc: Cooper Chiou <cooper.chiou@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210430143945.6776-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Registering multiple backlight devices with intel_backlight name will
obviously fail, regardless of whether they're two connectors in the same
drm device or two different drm devices.
It would be preferrable to switch to completely unique names, and sunset
the generic intel_backlight name. However, there are apparently users
out there that hardcode the name, so the change would break backward
compatibility.
As a compromise, register the first device with intel_backlight name. In
the common case, this is the only backlight device anyway. From the
second device on, use card%d-%s-backlight format, for example
card0-eDP-2-backlight, to make the name unique.
This approach does not preclude us from registering the first device
using the same naming scheme in the future.
v2: Keep using intel_backlight name for first backlight device
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/2794
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/7dc3f6974711ce44522189dc9db05d1e6e24e6d8.1619604743.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
