Add connector and backlight device name to logging, and propagate error
code from backlight_device_register() instead of flattening to
-ENODEV. Storing the name in an allocated buffer is unnecessary here,
but makes follow-up work on names much cleaner.
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/271206461d9c0f42755792236330b588df3b532e.1619604743.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
While converting the rest of the driver to use GRAPHICS_VER() and
MEDIA_VER(), following what was done for display, some discussions went
back on what we did for display:
1) Why is the == comparison special that deserves a separate
macro instead of just getting the version and comparing directly
like is done for >, >=, <=?
2) IS_DISPLAY_RANGE() is weird in that it omits the "_VER" for
brevity. If we remove the current users of IS_DISPLAY_VER(), we
could actually repurpose it for a range check
With (1) there could be an advantage if we used gen_mask since multiple
conditionals be combined by the compiler in a single and instruction and
check the result. However a) INTEL_GEN() doesn't use the mask since it
would make the code bigger everywhere else and b) in the cases it made
sense, it also made sense to convert to the _RANGE() variant.
So here we repurpose IS_DISPLAY_VER() to work with a [ from, to ] range
like was the IS_DISPLAY_RANGE() and convert the current IS_DISPLAY_VER()
users to use == and != operators. Aside from the definition changes,
this was done by the following semantic patch:
@@ expression dev_priv, E1; @@
- !IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, E1)
+ DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) != E1
@@ expression dev_priv, E1; @@
- IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, E1)
+ DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) == E1
@@ expression dev_priv, from, until; @@
- IS_DISPLAY_RANGE(dev_priv, from, until)
+ IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, from, until)
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
[Jani: Minor conflict resolve while applying.]
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210413051002.92589-4-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
Now that we've eliminated INTEL_GEN(), IS_GEN_RANGE(), etc. from the
display code, we should also kill off our use of the IS_GEN9_* macros
too. We'll do the conversion manually this time instead of using
Coccinelle since the most logical substitution can depend heavily on the
code context, and sometimes we can keep the code simpler if we make
additional adjustments such as swapping the order of if/else arms.
v2:
- Restore a lost negation in intel_pll_is_valid().
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Radhakrishna Sripada <radhakrishna.sripada@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210407203945.1432531-1-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
(cherry picked from commit 70bfb30743)
[Jani: cherry picked to topic branch to reduce conflicts]
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Use Coccinelle to convert most of the usage of INTEL_GEN() and IS_GEN()
in the display code to use DISPLAY_VER() comparisons instead. The
following semantic patch was used:
@@ expression dev_priv, E; @@
- INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) == E
+ IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, E)
@@ expression dev_priv; @@
- INTEL_GEN(dev_priv)
+ DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv)
@@ expression dev_priv; expression E; @@
- IS_GEN(dev_priv, E)
+ IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, E)
@@
expression dev_priv;
expression from, until;
@@
- IS_GEN_RANGE(dev_priv, from, until)
+ IS_DISPLAY_RANGE(dev_priv, from, until)
There are still some display-related uses of INTEL_GEN() in intel_pm.c
(watermark code) and i915_irq.c. Those will be updated separately.
v2:
- Use new IS_DISPLAY_RANGE and IS_DISPLAY_VER helpers. (Jani)
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210320044245.3920043-4-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
Using struct drm_device.pdev is deprecated. Convert i915 to struct
drm_device.dev. No functional changes.
v6:
* also remove assignment in selftests/ in a later patch (Chris)
v5:
* remove assignment in later patch (Chris)
v3:
* rebased
v2:
* move gt/ and gvt/ changes into separate patches
Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210128133127.2311-2-tzimmermann@suse.de
So-recently a bunch of laptops on the market have started using DPCD
backlight controls instead of the traditional DDI backlight controls.
Originally we thought we had this handled by adding VESA backlight
control support to i915, but the story ended up being a lot more
complicated then that.
Simply put-there's two main backlight interfaces Intel can see in the
wild. Intel's proprietary HDR backlight interface, and the standard VESA
backlight interface. Note that many panels have been observed to report
support for both backlight interfaces, but testing has shown far more
panels work with the Intel HDR backlight interface at the moment.
Additionally, the VBT appears to be capable of reporting support for the
VESA backlight interface but not the Intel HDR interface which needs to
be probed by setting the right magic OUI.
On top of that however, there's also actually two different variants of
the Intel HDR backlight interface. The first uses the AUX channel for
controlling the brightness of the screen in both SDR and HDR mode, and
the second only uses the AUX channel for setting the brightness level in
HDR mode - relying on PWM for setting the brightness level in SDR mode.
For the time being we've been using EDIDs to maintain a list of quirks
for panels that safely do support the VESA backlight interface. Adding
support for Intel's HDR backlight interface in addition however, should
finally allow us to auto-detect eDP backlight controls properly so long
as we probe like so:
* If the panel's VBT reports VESA backlight support, assume it really
does support it
* If the panel's VBT reports DDI backlight controls:
* First probe for Intel's HDR backlight interface
* If that fails, probe for VESA's backlight interface
* If that fails, assume no DPCD backlight control
* If the panel's VBT reports any other backlight type: just assume it
doesn't have DPCD backlight controls
Changes since v4:
* Fix checkpatch issues
Changes since v3:
* Stop using drm_device and use drm_i915_private instead
* Don't forget to return from intel_dp_aux_hdr_get_backlight() if we fail
to read the current backlight mode from the DPCD
* s/uint8_t/u8/
* Remove unneeded parenthesis in intel_dp_aux_hdr_enable_backlight()
* Use drm_dbg_kms() in intel_dp_aux_init_backlight_funcs()
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: thaytan@noraisin.net
Cc: Vasily Khoruzhick <anarsoul@gmail.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210114221709.2261452-4-lyude@redhat.com
Currently, every different type of backlight hook that i915 supports is
pretty straight forward - you have a backlight, probably through PWM
(but maybe DPCD), with a single set of platform-specific hooks that are
used for controlling it.
HDR backlights, in particular VESA and Intel's HDR backlight
implementations, can end up being more complicated. With Intel's
proprietary interface, HDR backlight controls always run through the
DPCD. When the backlight is in SDR backlight mode however, the driver
may need to bypass the TCON and control the backlight directly through
PWM.
So, in order to support this we'll need to split our backlight callbacks
into two groups: a set of high-level backlight control callbacks in
intel_panel, and an additional set of pwm-specific backlight control
callbacks. This also implies a functional changes for how these
callbacks are used:
* We now keep track of two separate backlight level ranges, one for the
high-level backlight, and one for the pwm backlight range
* We also keep track of backlight enablement and PWM backlight
enablement separately
* Since the currently set backlight level might not be the same as the
currently programmed PWM backlight level, we stop setting
panel->backlight.level with the currently programmed PWM backlight
level in panel->backlight.pwm_funcs->setup(). Instead, we rely
on the higher level backlight control functions to retrieve the
current PWM backlight level (in this case, intel_pwm_get_backlight()).
Note that there are still a few PWM backlight setup callbacks that
do actually need to retrieve the current PWM backlight level, although
we no longer save this value in panel->backlight.level like before.
Additionally, we drop the call to lpt_get_backlight() in
lpt_setup_backlight(), and avoid unconditionally writing the PWM value that
we get from it and only write it back if we're in CPU mode, and switching
to PCH mode. The reason for this is because in the original codepath for
this, it was expected that the intel_panel_bl_funcs->setup() hook would be
responsible for fetching the initial backlight level. On lpt systems, the
only time we could ever be in PCH backlight mode is during the initial
driver load - meaning that outside of the setup() hook, lpt_get_backlight()
will always be the callback used for retrieving the current backlight
level. After this patch we still need to fetch and write-back the PCH
backlight value if we're switching from CPU mode to PCH, but because
intel_pwm_setup_backlight() will retrieve the backlight level after setup()
using the get() hook, which always ends up being lpt_get_backlight(). Thus
- an additional call to lpt_get_backlight() in lpt_setup_backlight() is
made redundant.
v9:
* Drop the intel_panel_invert_pwm_level() call in lpt_setup_backlight()
* Remove leftover detritus from lpt_setup_backlight()
v8:
* Go back to getting initial brightness level with
intel_pwm_get_backlight(), the other fix we had was definitely wrong.
v7:
* Use panel->backlight.pwm_funcs->get() to get the backlight level in
intel_pwm_setup_backlight(), lest we upset lockdep
* Rebase
* Rename intel_panel_sanitize_pwm_level() to intel_panel_invert_pwm_level()
v6:
* Make sure to grab connection_mutex before calling
intel_pwm_get_backlight() in intel_pwm_setup_backlight()
v5:
* Fix indenting warnings from checkpatch
v4:
* Fix commit message
* Remove outdated comment in intel_panel.c
* Rename pwm_(min|max) to pwm_level_(min|max)
* Use intel_pwm_get_backlight() in intel_pwm_setup_backlight() instead of
indirection
* Don't move intel_dp_aux_init_bcklight_funcs() call to bottom of
intel_panel_init_backlight_funcs() quite yet
v3:
* Reuse intel_panel_bl_funcs() for pwm_funcs
* Explain why we drop lpt_get_backlight()
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: thaytan@noraisin.net
Cc: Vasily Khoruzhick <anarsoul@gmail.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210114221709.2261452-3-lyude@redhat.com
In the next commit where we split PWM related backlight functions from
higher-level backlight functions, we'll want to be able to retrieve the
backlight level for the current display panel from the
intel_panel_bl_funcs->setup() function using pwm_funcs->get(). Since
intel_panel_bl_funcs->setup() is called before we've fully read in the
current hardware state into our atomic state, we can't grab atomic
modesetting locks safely anyway in intel_panel_bl_funcs->setup(), and some
PWM backlight functions (vlv_get_backlight() in particular) require knowing
the currently used pipe we need to be able to discern the current display
pipe through other means. Luckily, we're already passing the current
display pipe to intel_panel_bl_funcs->setup() so all we have to do in order
to achieve this is pass down that parameter to intel_panel_bl_funcs->get().
So, fix this by accepting an additional pipe parameter in
intel_panel_bl_funcs->get(), and leave figuring out the current display
pipe up to the caller.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210114221709.2261452-2-lyude@redhat.com
The pch_get_backlight(), lpt_get_backlight(), and lpt_set_backlight()
functions operate directly on the hardware registers. If inverting the
value is needed, using intel_panel_compute_brightness(), it should only
be done in the interface between hardware registers and
panel->backlight.level.
The CPU mode takeover code added in commit 5b1ec9ac7a
("drm/i915/backlight: Fix backlight takeover on LPT, v3.") reads the
hardware register and converts to panel->backlight.level correctly,
however the value written back should remain in the hardware register
"domain".
This hasn't been an issue, because GM45 machines are the only known
users of i915.invert_brightness and the brightness invert quirk, and
without one of them no conversion is made. It's likely nobody's ever hit
the problem.
Fixes: 5b1ec9ac7a ("drm/i915/backlight: Fix backlight takeover on LPT, v3.")
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.1+
Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210108152841.6944-1-jani.nikula@intel.com
Instead of using intel_panel->backlight.level, have the caller provide us
with the current panel backlight value. We'll need this for when we
separate PWM-related backlight callbacks from other means of backlight
control (like DPCD backlight controls), as the caller of each PWM callback
will be responsible for converting the current brightness value to it's
respective PWM level.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201204223603.249878-4-lyude@redhat.com
Since we're going to need to add a set of lower-level PWM backlight
control hooks to be shared by normal backlight controls and HDR
backlight controls in SDR mode, let's add a prefix to the external PWM
backlight functions so that the difference between them and the high
level PWM-only backlight functions is a bit more obvious.
This introduces no functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: thaytan@noraisin.net
Cc: Vasily Khoruzhick <anarsoul@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201204223603.249878-3-lyude@redhat.com
This moves the functions into static const instead of having
funcs and data in the same struct.
It leaves the power callback alone, as it is used in a different
manner.
v2: leave power callback alone (Jani)
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201130210945.31850-1-airlied@gmail.com
Since the display hardware is all there even when INTEL_DISPLAY_ENABLED
return false we have to be capable of shutting it down cleanly so
as to not anger the hw. To that end let's reduce the effect of
!INTEL_DISPLAY_ENABLE to just treating all outputs as disconnected.
Should prevent anyone from automagically enabling any of them, while
still allowing us to cleanly shut them down.
v2: Put the check into the right place for CRT
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200910164256.25983-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Now that the PWM drivers which we use have been converted to the atomic
PWM API, we can move the i915 panel code over to using the atomic PWM API.
The removes a long standing FIXME and this removes a flicker where
the backlight brightness would jump to 100% when i915 loads even if
using the fastset path.
Note that this commit also simplifies pwm_disable_backlight(), by dropping
the intel_panel_actually_set_backlight(..., 0) call. This call sets the
PWM to 0% duty-cycle. I believe that this call was only present as a
workaround for a bug in the pwm-crc.c driver where it failed to clear the
PWM_OUTPUT_ENABLE bit. This is fixed by an earlier patch in this series.
After the dropping of this workaround, the usleep call, which seems
unnecessary to begin with, has no useful effect anymore, so drop that too.
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200903112337.4113-18-hdegoede@redhat.com
So far for devices using an external PWM controller (devices using
pwm_setup_backlight()), we have been hardcoding the minimum allowed
PWM level to 0. But several of these devices specify a non 0 minimum
setting in their VBT.
Change pwm_setup_backlight() to use get_backlight_min_vbt() to get
the minimum level.
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200903112337.4113-17-hdegoede@redhat.com
So far for devices using an external PWM controller (devices using
pwm_setup_backlight()), we have been hardcoding the period-time passed to
pwm_config() to 21333 ns.
I suspect this was done because many VBTs set the PWM frequency to 200
which corresponds to a period-time of 5000000 ns, which greatly exceeds
the PWM_MAX_PERIOD_NS define in the Crystal Cove PMIC PWM driver, which
used to be 21333.
This PWM_MAX_PERIOD_NS define was actually based on a bug in the PWM
driver where its period and duty-cycle times where off by a factor of 256.
Due to this bug the hardcoded CRC_PMIC_PWM_PERIOD_NS value of 21333 would
result in the PWM driver using its divider of 128, which would result in
a PWM output frequency of 6000000 Hz / 256 / 128 = 183 Hz. So actually
pretty close to the default VBT value of 200 Hz.
Now that this bug in the pwm-crc driver is fixed, we can actually use
the VBT defined frequency.
This is important because:
a) With the pwm-crc driver fixed it will now translate the hardcoded
CRC_PMIC_PWM_PERIOD_NS value of 21333 ns / 46 Khz to a PWM output
frequency of 23 KHz (the max it can do).
b) The pwm-lpss driver used on many models has always honored the
21333 ns / 46 Khz request
Some panels do not like such high output frequencies. E.g. on a Terra
Pad 1061 tablet, using the LPSS PWM controller, the backlight would go
from off to max, when changing the sysfs backlight brightness value from
90-100%, anything under aprox. 90% would turn the backlight fully off.
Honoring the VBT specified PWM frequency will also hopefully fix the
various bug reports which we have received about users perceiving the
backlight to flicker after a suspend/resume cycle.
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200903112337.4113-16-hdegoede@redhat.com
Factor the code which checks and drm_dbg_kms-s the VBT PWM frequency
out of get_backlight_max_vbt().
This is a preparation patch for honering the VBT PWM frequency for
devices which use an external PWM controller (devices using
pwm_setup_backlight()).
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200903112337.4113-15-hdegoede@redhat.com
The majority of this batch is conversion of the PWM period and duty
cycle to 64-bit unsigned integers, which is required so that some types
of hardware can generate the full range of signals that they're capable
of. The remainder is mostly minor fixes and cleanups.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQJNBAABCAA3FiEEiOrDCAFJzPfAjcif3SOs138+s6EFAl82iq0ZHHRoaWVycnku
cmVkaW5nQGdtYWlsLmNvbQAKCRDdI6zXfz6zoTXSD/9h6v8w/9oC9xDxEO+6vTF3
XNMWBO3PxzjNpI02bxYVMckb8J6AsDFwB+fsMnRvHooFXqi+/5iQvxyt6b8rTIRA
ThOEd+PJnX9l8P9I/k/5RbdiYA51GtJomDc1f85yCs6UaMnTMRj9+S3E7rWPW+LZ
azKegtqQloJxMM8w+MBS3+3w1c4h80tfHphU4DbNDCTS0Pq2rXK2B0BJq+oFWXS+
GpTut7jzbQBpVm5+pF/3YwjQ1ODoHL+LJYtjdYdFk0HJtddsGIzR8xFAci//maZj
NtbE6tFFSz97z18QCvHBNDySV3/qVIy+Pr2g141yv0uhjvJ3zms4uveD3wmxFSbZ
0LWaGdCRUbffI1g5uCWjSEspWo+oEY3A6LQ2RVpmNL44T/rvgZuYKbJmFSnM3qr5
DzB0gx5ZlagXGO9W1u4aif+VBfJdF7JUGWazbyZ1O36bSPF83T7db8Shok10Yx+J
DsmWaxDMxVE8DFNUOaoDHXUq8L8gW8OFKeBttO3zUwCCxpIn9qunwDiFqvlkQHgI
xVqC5Yp1oMqq5enYlLGLqnCahYuUXgBW91uyEpeB4hzZMhU2CTgei0bzHdu5xDE4
5ZDks2EZ7CibJJ2EKwWgIF8iVkpepdXj0Wpy7HT6FStR2/kauT58h36bLzhjbh54
GtD3Z5TDtV8lrabOfmk6pA==
=v6MG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag 'pwm/for-5.9-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/thierry.reding/linux-pwm
Pull pwm updates from Thierry Reding:
"The majority of this batch is conversion of the PWM period and duty
cycle to 64-bit unsigned integers, which is required so that some
types of hardware can generate the full range of signals that they're
capable of.
The remainder is mostly minor fixes and cleanups"
* tag 'pwm/for-5.9-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/thierry.reding/linux-pwm:
pwm: bcm-iproc: handle clk_get_rate() return
pwm: Replace HTTP links with HTTPS ones
pwm: omap-dmtimer: Repair pwm_omap_dmtimer_chip's broken kerneldoc header
pwm: mediatek: Provide missing kerneldoc description for 'soc' arg
pwm: bcm-kona: Remove impossible comparison when validating duty cycle
pwm: bcm-iproc: Remove impossible comparison when validating duty cycle
pwm: iqs620a: Use lowercase hexadecimal literals for consistency
pwm: Convert period and duty cycle to u64
clk: pwm: Use 64-bit division function
backlight: pwm_bl: Use 64-bit division function
pwm: sun4i: Use nsecs_to_jiffies to avoid a division
pwm: sifive: Use 64-bit division macro
pwm: iqs620a: Use 64-bit division
pwm: imx27: Use 64-bit division macro
pwm: imx-tpm: Use 64-bit division macro
pwm: clps711x: Use 64-bit division macro
hwmon: pwm-fan: Use 64-bit division macro
drm/i915: Use 64-bit division macro
Start using device specific parameters instead of module parameters for
most things. The module parameters become the immutable initial values
for i915 parameters. The device specific parameters in i915->params
start life as a copy of i915_modparams. Any later changes are only
reflected in the debugfs.
The stragglers are:
* i915.force_probe and i915.modeset. Needed before dev_priv is
available. This is fine because the parameters are read-only and never
modified.
* i915.verbose_state_checks. Passing dev_priv to I915_STATE_WARN and
I915_STATE_WARN_ON would result in massive and ugly churn. This is
handled by not exposing the parameter via debugfs, and leaving the
parameter writable in sysfs. This may be fixed up in follow-up work.
* i915.inject_probe_failure. Only makes sense in terms of the module,
not the device. This is handled by not exposing the parameter via
debugfs.
v2: Fix uc i915 lookup code (Michał Winiarski)
Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkilä <juha-pekka.heikkila@intel.com>
Cc: Venkata Sandeep Dhanalakota <venkata.s.dhanalakota@intel.com>
Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Acked-by: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200618150402.14022-1-jani.nikula@intel.com
Since the PWM framework is switching struct pwm_state.duty_cycle's
datatype to u64, prepare for this transition by using DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL
to handle a 64-bit dividend.
Signed-off-by: Guru Das Srinagesh <gurus@codeaurora.org>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
After the function is no longer marked 'inline', there
is now a new warning pointing out that the only caller
is inside of an #ifdef:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_panel.c:493:12: warning: 'scale_user_to_hw' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
493 | static u32 scale_user_to_hw(struct intel_connector *connector,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Move the function itself into that #ifdef as well.
Fixes: 81b55ef1f4 ("drm/i915: drop a bunch of superfluous inlines")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200428213106.3139170-1-arnd@arndb.de
(cherry picked from commit 794bdcf71f)
Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
After the function is no longer marked 'inline', there
is now a new warning pointing out that the only caller
is inside of an #ifdef:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_panel.c:493:12: warning: 'scale_user_to_hw' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
493 | static u32 scale_user_to_hw(struct intel_connector *connector,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Move the function itself into that #ifdef as well.
Fixes: 81b55ef1f4 ("drm/i915: drop a bunch of superfluous inlines")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200428213106.3139170-1-arnd@arndb.de
Pass the entire connector state to intel_{gmch,pch}_panel_fitting().
For now we just need to get at .scaling_mode but in the future we'll
want access to the margin properties as well.
v2: Deal with intel_dp_ycbcr420_config()
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200422161917.17389-5-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Make things a bit more abstract by replacing the pch_pfit.pos/size
raw register values with a drm_rect. Makes it slighly more convenient
to eg. compute the scaling factors.
v2: Use drm_rect_init()
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200422161917.17389-3-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Remove a number of inlines from .c files, and let the compiler decide
what's best. There's more to do, but need to start somewhere, and need
to start setting the example.
Acked-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200420140438.14672-2-jani.nikula@intel.com
We're going to want access to the atomic state for iterating
the slave crtcs when enabling the port sync master crtc. Pass
the atomic state all the way down.
The alternative would be yet another encoder hook which we'll
have to call after all the normal modeset stuff is done. Not
really a fan of yet another hook just for this.
Note that during readout state sanitation we are now going
to pass NULL as the atomic state since we don't have one.
We need to change that and then we can also s/crtc_state/crtc/
and s/conn_state/conn/ for the encoder hooks as well.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200313164831.5980-13-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Use intel_panel_compute_brightness() from pwm_setup_backlight() so that
we correctly take i915_modparams.invert_brightness and/or
QUIRK_INVERT_BRIGHTNESS into account when setting + getting the initial
brightness value.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200221172927.510027-1-hdegoede@redhat.com
At least Bay Trail (BYT) and Cherry Trail (CHT) devices can use 1 of 2
different PWM controllers for controlling the LCD's backlight brightness.
Either the one integrated into the PMIC or the one integrated into the
SoC (the 1st LPSS PWM controller).
So far in the LPSS code on BYT we have skipped registering the LPSS PWM
controller "pwm_backlight" lookup entry when a Crystal Cove PMIC is
present, assuming that in this case the PMIC PWM controller will be used.
On CHT we have been relying on only 1 of the 2 PWM controllers being
enabled in the DSDT at the same time; and always registered the lookup.
So far this has been working, but the correct way to determine which PWM
controller needs to be used is by checking a bit in the VBT table and
recently I've learned about 2 different BYT devices:
Point of View MOBII TAB-P800W
Acer Switch 10 SW5-012
Which use a Crystal Cove PMIC, yet the LCD is connected to the SoC/LPSS
PWM controller (and the VBT correctly indicates this), so here our old
heuristics fail.
This commit fixes using the wrong PWM controller on these devices by
calling pwm_get() for the right PWM controller based on the
VBT dsi.config.pwm_blc bit.
Note this is part of a series which contains 2 other patches which renames
the PWM lookup for the 1st SoC/LPSS PWM from "pwm_backlight" to
"pwm_pmic_backlight" and the PWM lookup for the Crystal Cove PMIC PWM
from "pwm_backlight" to "pwm_pmic_backlight".
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191216202906.1662893-4-hdegoede@redhat.com
Split up crtc_state->base to uapi. This is done using the following patch,
ran after the previous commit that splits out any hw references:
@@
struct intel_crtc_state *T;
@@
-T->base
+T->uapi
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191031112610.27608-5-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com
Split up crtc_state->base to hw where appropriate. This is done using the following patch:
@@
struct intel_crtc_state *T;
identifier x =~ "^(active|enable|degamma_lut|gamma_lut|ctm|mode|adjusted_mode)$";
@@
-T->base.x
+T->hw.x
@@
struct drm_crtc_state *T;
identifier x =~ "^(active|enable|degamma_lut|gamma_lut|ctm|mode|adjusted_mode)$";
@@
-to_intel_crtc_state(T)->base.x
+to_intel_crtc_state(T)->hw.x
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191031112610.27608-4-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com
Everything about the file is about display, and mostly about types
related to display. Move under display/ as intel_display_types.h to
reflect the facts.
There's still plenty to clean up, but start off with moving the file
where it logically belongs and naming according to contents.
v2: fix the include guard name in the renamed file
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190806113933.11799-1-jani.nikula@intel.com
Add a new subdirectory for display code, and start off by moving
modesetting output/encoder code. Judging by the include changes, this is
a surprisingly clean operation.
v2:
- move intel_sdvo_regs.h too
- use tabs for Makefile file lists and sort them
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Acked-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190613084416.6794-2-jani.nikula@intel.com
