After commit ac325fc2aa ("btrfs: do not hold the extent lock for entire
read") we can now trigger a race between a task doing a direct IO write
and readahead. When this race is triggered it results in tasks getting
stale data when they attempt do a buffered read (including the task that
did the direct IO write).
This race can be sporadically triggered with test case generic/418, failing
like this:
$ ./check generic/418
FSTYP -- btrfs
PLATFORM -- Linux/x86_64 debian0 6.13.0-rc7-btrfs-next-185+ #17 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Mon Feb 3 12:28:46 WET 2025
MKFS_OPTIONS -- /dev/sdc
MOUNT_OPTIONS -- /dev/sdc /home/fdmanana/btrfs-tests/scratch_1
generic/418 14s ... - output mismatch (see /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests/results//generic/418.out.bad)
--- tests/generic/418.out 2020-06-10 19:29:03.850519863 +0100
+++ /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests/results//generic/418.out.bad 2025-02-03 15:42:36.974609476 +0000
@@ -1,2 +1,5 @@
QA output created by 418
+cmpbuf: offset 0: Expected: 0x1, got 0x0
+[6:0] FAIL - comparison failed, offset 24576
+diotest -wp -b 4096 -n 8 -i 4 failed at loop 3
Silence is golden
...
(Run 'diff -u /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests/tests/generic/418.out /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests/results//generic/418.out.bad' to see the entire diff)
Ran: generic/418
Failures: generic/418
Failed 1 of 1 tests
The race happens like this:
1) A file has a prealloc extent for the range [16K, 28K);
2) Task A starts a direct IO write against file range [24K, 28K).
At the start of the direct IO write it invalidates the page cache at
__iomap_dio_rw() with kiocb_invalidate_pages() for the 4K page at file
offset 24K;
3) Task A enters btrfs_dio_iomap_begin() and locks the extent range
[24K, 28K);
4) Task B starts a readahead for file range [16K, 28K), entering
btrfs_readahead().
First it attempts to read the page at offset 16K by entering
btrfs_do_readpage(), where it calls get_extent_map(), locks the range
[16K, 20K) and gets the extent map for the range [16K, 28K), caching
it into the 'em_cached' variable declared in the local stack of
btrfs_readahead(), and then unlocks the range [16K, 20K).
Since the extent map has the prealloc flag, at btrfs_do_readpage() we
zero out the page's content and don't submit any bio to read the page
from the extent.
Then it attempts to read the page at offset 20K entering
btrfs_do_readpage() where we reuse the previously cached extent map
(decided by get_extent_map()) since it spans the page's range and
it's still in the inode's extent map tree.
Just like for the previous page, we zero out the page's content since
the extent map has the prealloc flag set.
Then it attempts to read the page at offset 24K entering
btrfs_do_readpage() where we reuse the previously cached extent map
(decided by get_extent_map()) since it spans the page's range and
it's still in the inode's extent map tree.
Just like for the previous pages, we zero out the page's content since
the extent map has the prealloc flag set. Note that we didn't lock the
extent range [24K, 28K), so we didn't synchronize with the ongoing
direct IO write being performed by task A;
5) Task A enters btrfs_create_dio_extent() and creates an ordered extent
for the range [24K, 28K), with the flags BTRFS_ORDERED_DIRECT and
BTRFS_ORDERED_PREALLOC set;
6) Task A unlocks the range [24K, 28K) at btrfs_dio_iomap_begin();
7) The ordered extent enters btrfs_finish_one_ordered() and locks the
range [24K, 28K);
8) Task A enters fs/iomap/direct-io.c:iomap_dio_complete() and it tries
to invalidate the page at offset 24K by calling
kiocb_invalidate_post_direct_write(), resulting in a call chain that
ends up at btrfs_release_folio().
The btrfs_release_folio() call ends up returning false because the range
for the page at file offset 24K is currently locked by the task doing
the ordered extent completion in the previous step (7), so we have:
btrfs_release_folio() ->
__btrfs_release_folio() ->
try_release_extent_mapping() ->
try_release_extent_state()
This last function checking that the range is locked and returning false
and propagating it up to btrfs_release_folio().
So this results in a failure to invalidate the page and
kiocb_invalidate_post_direct_write() triggers this message logged in
dmesg:
Page cache invalidation failure on direct I/O. Possible data corruption due to collision with buffered I/O!
After this we leave the page cache with stale data for the file range
[24K, 28K), filled with zeroes instead of the data written by direct IO
write (all bytes with a 0x01 value), so any task attempting to read with
buffered IO, including the task that did the direct IO write, will get
all bytes in the range with a 0x00 value instead of the written data.
Fix this by locking the range, with btrfs_lock_and_flush_ordered_range(),
at the two callers of btrfs_do_readpage() instead of doing it at
get_extent_map(), just like we did before commit ac325fc2aa ("btrfs: do
not hold the extent lock for entire read"), and unlocking the range after
all the calls to btrfs_do_readpage(). This way we never reuse a cached
extent map without flushing any pending ordered extents from a concurrent
direct IO write.
Fixes: ac325fc2aa ("btrfs: do not hold the extent lock for entire read")
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
It is meaningless to shift a byte count by folio_shift(). The folio index
is in units of PAGE_SIZE, not folio_size(). We can use folio_contains()
to make this work for arbitrary-order folios, so remove the assertion
that the folios are of order 0.
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
At btrfs_qgroup_cleanup_dropped_subvolume() all we want to commit the
current transaction in order to have all the qgroup rfer/excl numbers up
to date. However we are using btrfs_start_transaction(), which joins the
current transaction if there is one that is not yet committing, but also
starts a new one if there is none or if the current one is already
committing (its state is >= TRANS_STATE_COMMIT_START). This later case
results in unnecessary IO, wasting time and a pointless rotation of the
backup roots in the super block.
So instead of using btrfs_start_transaction() followed by a
btrfs_commit_transaction(), use btrfs_commit_current_transaction() which
achieves our purpose and avoids starting and committing new transactions.
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[BUG]
There is a bug report that btrfs outputs the following error message:
BTRFS info (device nvme0n1p2): qgroup scan completed (inconsistency flag cleared)
BTRFS warning (device nvme0n1p2): failed to cleanup qgroup 0/1179: -2
[CAUSE]
The error itself is pretty harmless, and the end user should ignore it.
When a subvolume is fully dropped, btrfs will call
btrfs_qgroup_cleanup_dropped_subvolume() to delete the qgroup.
However if a qgroup rescan happened before a subvolume fully dropped,
qgroup for that subvolume will not be re-created, as rescan will only
create new qgroup if there is a BTRFS_ROOT_REF_KEY found.
But before we drop a subvolume, the subvolume is unlinked thus there is no
BTRFS_ROOT_REF_KEY.
In that case, btrfs_remove_qgroup() will fail with -ENOENT and trigger
the above error message.
[FIX]
Just ignore -ENOENT error from btrfs_remove_qgroup() inside
btrfs_qgroup_cleanup_dropped_subvolume().
Reported-by: John Shand <jshand2013@gmail.com>
Link: https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1236056
Fixes: 839d6ea4f8 ("btrfs: automatically remove the subvolume qgroup")
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
When COWing a relocation tree path, at relocation.c:replace_path(), we
can trigger a lockdep splat while we are in the btrfs_search_slot() call
against the relocation root. This happens in that callchain at
ctree.c:read_block_for_search() when we happen to find a child extent
buffer already loaded through the fs tree with a lockdep class set to
the fs tree. So when we attempt to lock that extent buffer through a
relocation tree we have to reset the lockdep class to the class for a
relocation tree, since a relocation tree has extent buffers that used
to belong to a fs tree and may currently be already loaded (we swap
extent buffers between the two trees at the end of replace_path()).
However we are missing calls to btrfs_maybe_reset_lockdep_class() to reset
the lockdep class at ctree.c:read_block_for_search() before we read lock
an extent buffer, just like we did for btrfs_search_slot() in commit
b40130b23c ("btrfs: fix lockdep splat with reloc root extent buffers").
So add the missing btrfs_maybe_reset_lockdep_class() calls before the
attempts to read lock an extent buffer at ctree.c:read_block_for_search().
The lockdep splat was reported by syzbot and it looks like this:
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.13.0-rc5-syzkaller-00163-gab75170520d4 #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syz.0.0/5335 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff8880545dbc38 (btrfs-tree-01){++++}-{4:4}, at: btrfs_tree_read_lock_nested+0x2f/0x250 fs/btrfs/locking.c:146
but task is already holding lock:
ffff8880545dba58 (btrfs-treloc-02/1){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: btrfs_tree_lock_nested+0x2f/0x250 fs/btrfs/locking.c:189
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #2 (btrfs-treloc-02/1){+.+.}-{4:4}:
reacquire_held_locks+0x3eb/0x690 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5374
__lock_release kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5563 [inline]
lock_release+0x396/0xa30 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5870
up_write+0x79/0x590 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1629
btrfs_force_cow_block+0x14b3/0x1fd0 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:660
btrfs_cow_block+0x371/0x830 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:755
btrfs_search_slot+0xc01/0x3180 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:2153
replace_path+0x1243/0x2740 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1224
merge_reloc_root+0xc46/0x1ad0 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1692
merge_reloc_roots+0x3b3/0x980 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1942
relocate_block_group+0xb0a/0xd40 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:3754
btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x77d/0xd90 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:4087
btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x12c/0x3b0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3494
__btrfs_balance+0x1b0f/0x26b0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4278
btrfs_balance+0xbdc/0x10c0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4655
btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x493/0x7c0 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:3670
vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
__do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:906 [inline]
__se_sys_ioctl+0xf5/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:892
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
-> #1 (btrfs-tree-01/1){+.+.}-{4:4}:
lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5849
down_write_nested+0xa2/0x220 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1693
btrfs_tree_lock_nested+0x2f/0x250 fs/btrfs/locking.c:189
btrfs_init_new_buffer fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:5052 [inline]
btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0x41c/0x1440 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:5132
btrfs_force_cow_block+0x526/0x1fd0 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:573
btrfs_cow_block+0x371/0x830 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:755
btrfs_search_slot+0xc01/0x3180 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:2153
btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x9c/0x1a0 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:4351
btrfs_insert_empty_item fs/btrfs/ctree.h:688 [inline]
btrfs_insert_inode_ref+0x2bb/0xf80 fs/btrfs/inode-item.c:330
btrfs_rename_exchange fs/btrfs/inode.c:7990 [inline]
btrfs_rename2+0xcb7/0x2b90 fs/btrfs/inode.c:8374
vfs_rename+0xbdb/0xf00 fs/namei.c:5067
do_renameat2+0xd94/0x13f0 fs/namei.c:5224
__do_sys_renameat2 fs/namei.c:5258 [inline]
__se_sys_renameat2 fs/namei.c:5255 [inline]
__x64_sys_renameat2+0xce/0xe0 fs/namei.c:5255
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
-> #0 (btrfs-tree-01){++++}-{4:4}:
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3161 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3280 [inline]
validate_chain+0x18ef/0x5920 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3904
__lock_acquire+0x1397/0x2100 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5226
lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5849
down_read_nested+0xb5/0xa50 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1649
btrfs_tree_read_lock_nested+0x2f/0x250 fs/btrfs/locking.c:146
btrfs_tree_read_lock fs/btrfs/locking.h:188 [inline]
read_block_for_search+0x718/0xbb0 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1610
btrfs_search_slot+0x1274/0x3180 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:2237
replace_path+0x1243/0x2740 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1224
merge_reloc_root+0xc46/0x1ad0 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1692
merge_reloc_roots+0x3b3/0x980 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1942
relocate_block_group+0xb0a/0xd40 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:3754
btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x77d/0xd90 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:4087
btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x12c/0x3b0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3494
__btrfs_balance+0x1b0f/0x26b0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4278
btrfs_balance+0xbdc/0x10c0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4655
btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x493/0x7c0 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:3670
vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
__do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:906 [inline]
__se_sys_ioctl+0xf5/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:892
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
other info that might help us debug this:
Chain exists of:
btrfs-tree-01 --> btrfs-tree-01/1 --> btrfs-treloc-02/1
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(btrfs-treloc-02/1);
lock(btrfs-tree-01/1);
lock(btrfs-treloc-02/1);
rlock(btrfs-tree-01);
*** DEADLOCK ***
8 locks held by syz.0.0/5335:
#0: ffff88801e3ae420 (sb_writers#13){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: mnt_want_write_file+0x5e/0x200 fs/namespace.c:559
#1: ffff888052c760d0 (&fs_info->reclaim_bgs_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: __btrfs_balance+0x4c2/0x26b0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4183
#2: ffff888052c74850 (&fs_info->cleaner_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x775/0xd90 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:4086
#3: ffff88801e3ae610 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: merge_reloc_root+0xf11/0x1ad0 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1659
#4: ffff888052c76470 (btrfs_trans_num_writers){++++}-{0:0}, at: join_transaction+0x405/0xda0 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:288
#5: ffff888052c76498 (btrfs_trans_num_extwriters){++++}-{0:0}, at: join_transaction+0x405/0xda0 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:288
#6: ffff8880545db878 (btrfs-tree-01/1){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: btrfs_tree_lock_nested+0x2f/0x250 fs/btrfs/locking.c:189
#7: ffff8880545dba58 (btrfs-treloc-02/1){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: btrfs_tree_lock_nested+0x2f/0x250 fs/btrfs/locking.c:189
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5335 Comm: syz.0.0 Not tainted 6.13.0-rc5-syzkaller-00163-gab75170520d4 #0
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2~bpo12+1 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:120
print_circular_bug+0x13a/0x1b0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2074
check_noncircular+0x36a/0x4a0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2206
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3161 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3280 [inline]
validate_chain+0x18ef/0x5920 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3904
__lock_acquire+0x1397/0x2100 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5226
lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5849
down_read_nested+0xb5/0xa50 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1649
btrfs_tree_read_lock_nested+0x2f/0x250 fs/btrfs/locking.c:146
btrfs_tree_read_lock fs/btrfs/locking.h:188 [inline]
read_block_for_search+0x718/0xbb0 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1610
btrfs_search_slot+0x1274/0x3180 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:2237
replace_path+0x1243/0x2740 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1224
merge_reloc_root+0xc46/0x1ad0 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1692
merge_reloc_roots+0x3b3/0x980 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1942
relocate_block_group+0xb0a/0xd40 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:3754
btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x77d/0xd90 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:4087
btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x12c/0x3b0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3494
__btrfs_balance+0x1b0f/0x26b0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4278
btrfs_balance+0xbdc/0x10c0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4655
btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x493/0x7c0 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:3670
vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
__do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:906 [inline]
__se_sys_ioctl+0xf5/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:892
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
RIP: 0033:0x7f1ac6985d29
Code: ff ff c3 (...)
RSP: 002b:00007f1ac63fe038 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f1ac6b76160 RCX: 00007f1ac6985d29
RDX: 0000000020000180 RSI: 00000000c4009420 RDI: 0000000000000007
RBP: 00007f1ac6a01b08 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 0000000000000001 R14: 00007f1ac6b76160 R15: 00007fffda145a88
</TASK>
Reported-by: syzbot+63913e558c084f7f8fdc@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/677b3014.050a0220.3b53b0.0064.GAE@google.com/
Fixes: 99785998ed ("btrfs: reduce lock contention when eb cache miss for btree search")
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Add a selftest creating three extents and then deleting two out of the
three extents.
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Test creating a range of three RAID stripe-extents and then punch a hole
in the middle, deleting all of the middle extents and partially deleting
the "book ends".
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Add a selftest for punching a hole into a RAID stripe extent. The test
create an 1M extent and punches a 64k bytes long hole at offset of 32k from
the start of the extent.
Afterwards it verifies the start and length of both resulting new extents
"left" and "right" as well as the absence of the hole.
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Add a selftest for RAID stripe-tree deletion with a delete range spanning
two items, so that we're punching a hole into two adjacent RAID stripe
extents truncating the first and "moving" the second to the right.
The following diagram illustrates the operation:
|--- RAID Stripe Extent ---||--- RAID Stripe Extent ---|
|----- keep -----|--- drop ---|----- keep ----|
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The selftests for partially deleting the start or tail of RAID
stripe-extents split these extents in half.
This can hide errors in the calculation, so don't split the RAID
stripe-extents in half but delete the first or last 16K of the 64K
extents.
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Commit 5e72aabc1f ("btrfs: return ENODATA in case RST lookup fails")
changed btrfs_get_raid_extent_offset()'s return value to ENODATA in case
the RAID stripe-tree lookup failed.
Adjust the test cases which check for absence of a given range to check
for ENODATA as return value in this case.
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
If the stripe extent we want to delete starts before the range we want to
delete and ends after the range we want to delete we're punching a
hole in the stripe extent:
|--- RAID Stripe Extent ---|
| keep |--- drop ---| keep |
This means we need to a) truncate the existing item and b)
create a second item for the remaining range.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
When a user requests the deletion of a range that spans multiple stripe
extents and btrfs_search_slot() returns us the second RAID stripe extent,
we need to pick the previous item and truncate it, if there's still a
range to delete left, move on to the next item.
The following diagram illustrates the operation:
|--- RAID Stripe Extent ---||--- RAID Stripe Extent ---|
|--- keep ---|--- drop ---|
While at it, comment the trivial case of a whole item delete as well.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Fix tail delete of RAID stripe-extents, if there is a range to be deleted
as well after the tail delete of the extent.
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
When deleting the front of a RAID stripe-extent the delete code
miscalculates the size on how much to pad the remaining extent part in the
front.
Fix the calculation so we're always having the sizes we expect.
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
When modifying a RAID stripe-extent, ASSERT() that the length of the new
RAID stripe-extent is always greater than 0.
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Even if the RAID stripe-tree is not enabled in the filesystem,
do_free_extent_accounting() still calls into btrfs_delete_raid_extent().
Check if the extent in question is on a block-group that has a profile
which is used by RAID stripe-tree before attempting to delete a stripe
extent. Return early if it doesn't, otherwise we're doing a unnecessary
search.
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
RAID stripe-tree is an incompatible feature not a read-only compatible, so
set the incompat flag not a compat_ro one in the selftest code.
Subsequent changes in btrfs_delete_raid_extent() will start checking for
this flag.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Add an io_uring interface for encoded writes, with the same parameters
as the BTRFS_IOC_ENCODED_WRITE ioctl.
As with the encoded reads code, there's a test program for this at
https://github.com/maharmstone/io_uring-encoded, and I'll get this
worked into an fstest.
How io_uring works is that it initially calls btrfs_uring_cmd with the
IO_URING_F_NONBLOCK flag set, and if we return -EAGAIN it tries again in
a kthread with the flag cleared.
Ideally we'd honour this and call try_lock etc., but there's still a lot
of work to be done to create non-blocking versions of all the functions
in our write path. Instead, just validate the input in
btrfs_uring_encoded_write() on the first pass and return -EAGAIN, with a
view to properly optimizing the optimistic path later on.
Signed-off-by: Mark Harmstone <maharmstone@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The function btrfs_cleanup_ordered_extents() is only called in error
handling path, and the last caller with a @locked_folio parameter was
removed to fix a bug in the btrfs_run_delalloc_range() error handling.
There is no need to pass @locked_folio parameter anymore.
Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
All the error handling bugs I hit so far are all -ENOSPC from either:
- cow_file_range()
- run_delalloc_nocow()
- submit_uncompressed_range()
Previously when those functions failed, there was no error message at
all, making the debugging much harder.
So here we introduce extra error messages for:
- cow_file_range()
- run_delalloc_nocow()
- submit_uncompressed_range()
- writepage_delalloc() when btrfs_run_delalloc_range() failed
- extent_writepage() when extent_writepage_io() failed
One example of the new debug error messages is the following one:
run fstests generic/750 at 2024-12-08 12:41:41
BTRFS: device fsid 461b25f5-e240-4543-8deb-e7c2bd01a6d3 devid 1 transid 8 /dev/mapper/test-scratch1 (253:4) scanned by mount (2436600)
BTRFS info (device dm-4): first mount of filesystem 461b25f5-e240-4543-8deb-e7c2bd01a6d3
BTRFS info (device dm-4): using crc32c (crc32c-arm64) checksum algorithm
BTRFS info (device dm-4): forcing free space tree for sector size 4096 with page size 65536
BTRFS info (device dm-4): using free-space-tree
BTRFS warning (device dm-4): read-write for sector size 4096 with page size 65536 is experimental
BTRFS info (device dm-4): checking UUID tree
BTRFS error (device dm-4): cow_file_range failed, root=363 inode=412 start=503808 len=98304: -28
BTRFS error (device dm-4): run_delalloc_nocow failed, root=363 inode=412 start=503808 len=98304: -28
BTRFS error (device dm-4): failed to run delalloc range, root=363 ino=412 folio=458752 submit_bitmap=11-15 start=503808 len=98304: -28
Which shows an error from cow_file_range() which is called inside a
nocow write attempt, along with the extra bitmap from
writepage_delalloc().
Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
For btrfs_folio_assert_not_dirty() and btrfs_folio_set_lock(), we call
bitmap_test_range_all_zero() to ensure the involved range has no
dirty/lock bit already set.
However with my recent enhanced delalloc range error handling, I was
hitting the ASSERT() inside btrfs_folio_set_lock(), and it turns out
that some error handling path is not properly updating the folio flags.
So add some extra dumping for the ASSERTs to dump the involved bitmap
to help debug.
Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We're dumping the locked bitmap into the @checked_bitmap variable,
printing incorrect values during debug.
Thankfully even during my development I haven't hit a case where I need
to dump the locked bitmap. But for the sake of consistency, fix it by
dupping the locked bitmap into @locked_bitmap variable for output.
Fixes: 75258f20fb ("btrfs: subpage: dump extra subpage bitmaps for debug")
Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[BUG]
With CONFIG_DEBUG_VM set, test case generic/476 has some chance to crash
with the following VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO():
BTRFS error (device dm-3): cow_file_range failed, start 1146880 end 1253375 len 106496 ret -28
BTRFS error (device dm-3): run_delalloc_nocow failed, start 1146880 end 1253375 len 106496 ret -28
page: refcount:4 mapcount:0 mapping:00000000592787cc index:0x12 pfn:0x10664
aops:btrfs_aops [btrfs] ino:101 dentry name(?):"f1774"
flags: 0x2fffff80004028(uptodate|lru|private|node=0|zone=2|lastcpupid=0xfffff)
page dumped because: VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(!folio_test_locked(folio))
------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at mm/page-writeback.c:2992!
Internal error: Oops - BUG: 00000000f2000800 [#1] SMP
CPU: 2 UID: 0 PID: 3943513 Comm: kworker/u24:15 Tainted: G OE 6.12.0-rc7-custom+ #87
Tainted: [O]=OOT_MODULE, [E]=UNSIGNED_MODULE
Hardware name: QEMU KVM Virtual Machine, BIOS unknown 2/2/2022
Workqueue: events_unbound btrfs_async_reclaim_data_space [btrfs]
pc : folio_clear_dirty_for_io+0x128/0x258
lr : folio_clear_dirty_for_io+0x128/0x258
Call trace:
folio_clear_dirty_for_io+0x128/0x258
btrfs_folio_clamp_clear_dirty+0x80/0xd0 [btrfs]
__process_folios_contig+0x154/0x268 [btrfs]
extent_clear_unlock_delalloc+0x5c/0x80 [btrfs]
run_delalloc_nocow+0x5f8/0x760 [btrfs]
btrfs_run_delalloc_range+0xa8/0x220 [btrfs]
writepage_delalloc+0x230/0x4c8 [btrfs]
extent_writepage+0xb8/0x358 [btrfs]
extent_write_cache_pages+0x21c/0x4e8 [btrfs]
btrfs_writepages+0x94/0x150 [btrfs]
do_writepages+0x74/0x190
filemap_fdatawrite_wbc+0x88/0xc8
start_delalloc_inodes+0x178/0x3a8 [btrfs]
btrfs_start_delalloc_roots+0x174/0x280 [btrfs]
shrink_delalloc+0x114/0x280 [btrfs]
flush_space+0x250/0x2f8 [btrfs]
btrfs_async_reclaim_data_space+0x180/0x228 [btrfs]
process_one_work+0x164/0x408
worker_thread+0x25c/0x388
kthread+0x100/0x118
ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
Code: 910a8021 a90363f7 a9046bf9 94012379 (d4210000)
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
[CAUSE]
The first two lines of extra debug messages show the problem is caused
by the error handling of run_delalloc_nocow().
E.g. we have the following dirtied range (4K blocksize 4K page size):
0 16K 32K
|//////////////////////////////////////|
| Pre-allocated |
And the range [0, 16K) has a preallocated extent.
- Enter run_delalloc_nocow() for range [0, 16K)
Which found range [0, 16K) is preallocated, can do the proper NOCOW
write.
- Enter fallback_to_fow() for range [16K, 32K)
Since the range [16K, 32K) is not backed by preallocated extent, we
have to go COW.
- cow_file_range() failed for range [16K, 32K)
So cow_file_range() will do the clean up by clearing folio dirty,
unlock the folios.
Now the folios in range [16K, 32K) is unlocked.
- Enter extent_clear_unlock_delalloc() from run_delalloc_nocow()
Which is called with PAGE_START_WRITEBACK to start page writeback.
But folios can only be marked writeback when it's properly locked,
thus this triggered the VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO().
Furthermore there is another hidden but common bug that
run_delalloc_nocow() is not clearing the folio dirty flags in its error
handling path.
This is the common bug shared between run_delalloc_nocow() and
cow_file_range().
[FIX]
- Clear folio dirty for range [@start, @cur_offset)
Introduce a helper, cleanup_dirty_folios(), which
will find and lock the folio in the range, clear the dirty flag and
start/end the writeback, with the extra handling for the
@locked_folio.
- Introduce a helper to clear folio dirty, start and end writeback
- Introduce a helper to record the last failed COW range end
This is to trace which range we should skip, to avoid double
unlocking.
- Skip the failed COW range for the error handling
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[BUG]
When testing with COW fixup marked as BUG_ON() (this is involved with the
new pin_user_pages*() change, which should not result new out-of-band
dirty pages), I hit a crash triggered by the BUG_ON() from hitting COW
fixup path.
This BUG_ON() happens just after a failed btrfs_run_delalloc_range():
BTRFS error (device dm-2): failed to run delalloc range, root 348 ino 405 folio 65536 submit_bitmap 6-15 start 90112 len 106496: -28
------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:1444!
Internal error: Oops - BUG: 00000000f2000800 [#1] SMP
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 434621 Comm: kworker/u24:8 Tainted: G OE 6.12.0-rc7-custom+ #86
Hardware name: QEMU KVM Virtual Machine, BIOS unknown 2/2/2022
Workqueue: events_unbound btrfs_async_reclaim_data_space [btrfs]
pc : extent_writepage_io+0x2d4/0x308 [btrfs]
lr : extent_writepage_io+0x2d4/0x308 [btrfs]
Call trace:
extent_writepage_io+0x2d4/0x308 [btrfs]
extent_writepage+0x218/0x330 [btrfs]
extent_write_cache_pages+0x1d4/0x4b0 [btrfs]
btrfs_writepages+0x94/0x150 [btrfs]
do_writepages+0x74/0x190
filemap_fdatawrite_wbc+0x88/0xc8
start_delalloc_inodes+0x180/0x3b0 [btrfs]
btrfs_start_delalloc_roots+0x174/0x280 [btrfs]
shrink_delalloc+0x114/0x280 [btrfs]
flush_space+0x250/0x2f8 [btrfs]
btrfs_async_reclaim_data_space+0x180/0x228 [btrfs]
process_one_work+0x164/0x408
worker_thread+0x25c/0x388
kthread+0x100/0x118
ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
Code: aa1403e1 9402f3ef aa1403e0 9402f36f (d4210000)
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
[CAUSE]
That failure is mostly from cow_file_range(), where we can hit -ENOSPC.
Although the -ENOSPC is already a bug related to our space reservation
code, let's just focus on the error handling.
For example, we have the following dirty range [0, 64K) of an inode,
with 4K sector size and 4K page size:
0 16K 32K 48K 64K
|///////////////////////////////////////|
|#######################################|
Where |///| means page are still dirty, and |###| means the extent io
tree has EXTENT_DELALLOC flag.
- Enter extent_writepage() for page 0
- Enter btrfs_run_delalloc_range() for range [0, 64K)
- Enter cow_file_range() for range [0, 64K)
- Function btrfs_reserve_extent() only reserved one 16K extent
So we created extent map and ordered extent for range [0, 16K)
0 16K 32K 48K 64K
|////////|//////////////////////////////|
|<- OE ->|##############################|
And range [0, 16K) has its delalloc flag cleared.
But since we haven't yet submit any bio, involved 4 pages are still
dirty.
- Function btrfs_reserve_extent() returns with -ENOSPC
Now we have to run error cleanup, which will clear all
EXTENT_DELALLOC* flags and clear the dirty flags for the remaining
ranges:
0 16K 32K 48K 64K
|////////| |
| | |
Note that range [0, 16K) still has its pages dirty.
- Some time later, writeback is triggered again for the range [0, 16K)
since the page range still has dirty flags.
- btrfs_run_delalloc_range() will do nothing because there is no
EXTENT_DELALLOC flag.
- extent_writepage_io() finds page 0 has no ordered flag
Which falls into the COW fixup path, triggering the BUG_ON().
Unfortunately this error handling bug dates back to the introduction of
btrfs. Thankfully with the abuse of COW fixup, at least it won't crash
the kernel.
[FIX]
Instead of immediately unlocking the extent and folios, we keep the extent
and folios locked until either erroring out or the whole delalloc range
finished.
When the whole delalloc range finished without error, we just unlock the
whole range with PAGE_SET_ORDERED (and PAGE_UNLOCK for !keep_locked
cases), with EXTENT_DELALLOC and EXTENT_LOCKED cleared.
And the involved folios will be properly submitted, with their dirty
flags cleared during submission.
For the error path, it will be a little more complex:
- The range with ordered extent allocated (range (1))
We only clear the EXTENT_DELALLOC and EXTENT_LOCKED, as the remaining
flags are cleaned up by
btrfs_mark_ordered_io_finished()->btrfs_finish_one_ordered().
For folios we finish the IO (clear dirty, start writeback and
immediately finish the writeback) and unlock the folios.
- The range with reserved extent but no ordered extent (range(2))
- The range we never touched (range(3))
For both range (2) and range(3) the behavior is not changed.
Now even if cow_file_range() failed halfway with some successfully
reserved extents/ordered extents, we will keep all folios clean, so
there will be no future writeback triggered on them.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[BUG]
If we failed to compress the range, or cannot reserve a large enough
data extent (e.g. too fragmented free space), we will fall back to
submit_uncompressed_range().
But inside submit_uncompressed_range(), run_delalloc_cow() can also fail
due to -ENOSPC or any other error.
In that case there are 3 bugs in the error handling:
1) Double freeing for the same ordered extent
This can lead to crash due to ordered extent double accounting
2) Start/end writeback without updating the subpage writeback bitmap
3) Unlock the folio without clear the subpage lock bitmap
Both bugs 2) and 3) will crash the kernel if the btrfs block size is
smaller than folio size, as the next time the folio gets writeback/lock
updates, subpage will find the bitmap already have the range set,
triggering an ASSERT().
[CAUSE]
Bug 1) happens in the following call chain:
submit_uncompressed_range()
|- run_delalloc_cow()
| |- cow_file_range()
| |- btrfs_reserve_extent()
| Failed with -ENOSPC or whatever error
|
|- btrfs_clean_up_ordered_extents()
| |- btrfs_mark_ordered_io_finished()
| Which cleans all the ordered extents in the async_extent range.
|
|- btrfs_mark_ordered_io_finished()
Which cleans the folio range.
The finished ordered extents may not be immediately removed from the
ordered io tree, as they are removed inside a work queue.
So the second btrfs_mark_ordered_io_finished() may find the finished but
not-yet-removed ordered extents, and double free them.
Furthermore, the second btrfs_mark_ordered_io_finished() is not subpage
compatible, as it uses fixed folio_pos() with PAGE_SIZE, which can cover
other ordered extents.
Bugs 2) and 3) are more straightforward, btrfs just calls folio_unlock(),
folio_start_writeback() and folio_end_writeback(), other than the helpers
which handle subpage cases.
[FIX]
For bug 1) since the first btrfs_cleanup_ordered_extents() call is
handling the whole range, we should not do the second
btrfs_mark_ordered_io_finished() call.
And for the first btrfs_cleanup_ordered_extents(), we no longer need to
pass the @locked_page parameter, as we are already in the async extent
context, thus will never rely on the error handling inside
btrfs_run_delalloc_range().
So just let the btrfs_clean_up_ordered_extents() handle every folio
equally.
For bug 2) we should not even call
folio_start_writeback()/folio_end_writeback() anymore.
As the error handling protocol, cow_file_range() should clear
dirty flag and start/finish the writeback for the whole range passed in.
For bug 3) just change the folio_unlock() to btrfs_folio_end_lock()
helper.
Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[BUG]
If submit_one_sector() failed inside extent_writepage_io() for sector
size < page size cases (e.g. 4K sector size and 64K page size), then
we can hit double ordered extent accounting error.
This should be very rare, as submit_one_sector() only fails when we
failed to grab the extent map, and such extent map should exist inside
the memory and has been pinned.
[CAUSE]
For example we have the following folio layout:
0 4K 32K 48K 60K 64K
|//| |//////| |///|
Where |///| is the dirty range we need to writeback. The 3 different
dirty ranges are submitted for regular COW.
Now we hit the following sequence:
- submit_one_sector() returned 0 for [0, 4K)
- submit_one_sector() returned 0 for [32K, 48K)
- submit_one_sector() returned error for [60K, 64K)
- btrfs_mark_ordered_io_finished() called for the whole folio
This will mark the following ranges as finished:
* [0, 4K)
* [32K, 48K)
Both ranges have their IO already submitted, this cleanup will
lead to double accounting.
* [60K, 64K)
That's the correct cleanup.
The only good news is, this error is only theoretical, as the target
extent map is always pinned, thus we should directly grab it from
memory, other than reading it from the disk.
[FIX]
Instead of calling btrfs_mark_ordered_io_finished() for the whole folio
range, which can touch ranges we should not touch, instead
move the error handling inside extent_writepage_io().
So that we can cleanup exact sectors that ought to be submitted but failed.
This provides much more accurate cleanup, avoiding the double accounting.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.15+
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[BUG]
When running btrfs with block size (4K) smaller than page size (64K,
aarch64), there is a very high chance to crash the kernel at
generic/750, with the following messages:
(before the call traces, there are 3 extra debug messages added)
BTRFS warning (device dm-3): read-write for sector size 4096 with page size 65536 is experimental
BTRFS info (device dm-3): checking UUID tree
hrtimer: interrupt took 5451385 ns
BTRFS error (device dm-3): cow_file_range failed, root=4957 inode=257 start=1605632 len=69632: -28
BTRFS error (device dm-3): run_delalloc_nocow failed, root=4957 inode=257 start=1605632 len=69632: -28
BTRFS error (device dm-3): failed to run delalloc range, root=4957 ino=257 folio=1572864 submit_bitmap=8-15 start=1605632 len=69632: -28
------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 3020984 at ordered-data.c:360 can_finish_ordered_extent+0x370/0x3b8 [btrfs]
CPU: 2 UID: 0 PID: 3020984 Comm: kworker/u24:1 Tainted: G OE 6.13.0-rc1-custom+ #89
Tainted: [O]=OOT_MODULE, [E]=UNSIGNED_MODULE
Hardware name: QEMU KVM Virtual Machine, BIOS unknown 2/2/2022
Workqueue: events_unbound btrfs_async_reclaim_data_space [btrfs]
pc : can_finish_ordered_extent+0x370/0x3b8 [btrfs]
lr : can_finish_ordered_extent+0x1ec/0x3b8 [btrfs]
Call trace:
can_finish_ordered_extent+0x370/0x3b8 [btrfs] (P)
can_finish_ordered_extent+0x1ec/0x3b8 [btrfs] (L)
btrfs_mark_ordered_io_finished+0x130/0x2b8 [btrfs]
extent_writepage+0x10c/0x3b8 [btrfs]
extent_write_cache_pages+0x21c/0x4e8 [btrfs]
btrfs_writepages+0x94/0x160 [btrfs]
do_writepages+0x74/0x190
filemap_fdatawrite_wbc+0x74/0xa0
start_delalloc_inodes+0x17c/0x3b0 [btrfs]
btrfs_start_delalloc_roots+0x17c/0x288 [btrfs]
shrink_delalloc+0x11c/0x280 [btrfs]
flush_space+0x288/0x328 [btrfs]
btrfs_async_reclaim_data_space+0x180/0x228 [btrfs]
process_one_work+0x228/0x680
worker_thread+0x1bc/0x360
kthread+0x100/0x118
ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
BTRFS critical (device dm-3): bad ordered extent accounting, root=4957 ino=257 OE offset=1605632 OE len=16384 to_dec=16384 left=0
BTRFS critical (device dm-3): bad ordered extent accounting, root=4957 ino=257 OE offset=1622016 OE len=12288 to_dec=12288 left=0
Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000008
BTRFS critical (device dm-3): bad ordered extent accounting, root=4957 ino=257 OE offset=1634304 OE len=8192 to_dec=4096 left=0
CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 3286940 Comm: kworker/u24:3 Tainted: G W OE 6.13.0-rc1-custom+ #89
Hardware name: QEMU KVM Virtual Machine, BIOS unknown 2/2/2022
Workqueue: btrfs_work_helper [btrfs] (btrfs-endio-write)
pstate: 404000c5 (nZcv daIF +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
pc : process_one_work+0x110/0x680
lr : worker_thread+0x1bc/0x360
Call trace:
process_one_work+0x110/0x680 (P)
worker_thread+0x1bc/0x360 (L)
worker_thread+0x1bc/0x360
kthread+0x100/0x118
ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
Code: f84086a1 f9000fe1 53041c21 b9003361 (f9400661)
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
Kernel panic - not syncing: Oops: Fatal exception
SMP: stopping secondary CPUs
SMP: failed to stop secondary CPUs 2-3
Dumping ftrace buffer:
(ftrace buffer empty)
Kernel Offset: 0x275bb9540000 from 0xffff800080000000
PHYS_OFFSET: 0xffff8fbba0000000
CPU features: 0x100,00000070,00801250,8201720b
[CAUSE]
The above warning is triggered immediately after the delalloc range
failure, this happens in the following sequence:
- Range [1568K, 1636K) is dirty
1536K 1568K 1600K 1636K 1664K
| |/////////|////////| |
Where 1536K, 1600K and 1664K are page boundaries (64K page size)
- Enter extent_writepage() for page 1536K
- Enter run_delalloc_nocow() with locked page 1536K and range
[1568K, 1636K)
This is due to the inode having preallocated extents.
- Enter cow_file_range() with locked page 1536K and range
[1568K, 1636K)
- btrfs_reserve_extent() only reserved two extents
The main loop of cow_file_range() only reserved two data extents,
Now we have:
1536K 1568K 1600K 1636K 1664K
| |<-->|<--->|/|///////| |
1584K 1596K
Range [1568K, 1596K) has an ordered extent reserved.
- btrfs_reserve_extent() failed inside cow_file_range() for file offset
1596K
This is already a bug in our space reservation code, but for now let's
focus on the error handling path.
Now cow_file_range() returned -ENOSPC.
- btrfs_run_delalloc_range() do error cleanup <<< ROOT CAUSE
Call btrfs_cleanup_ordered_extents() with locked folio 1536K and range
[1568K, 1636K)
Function btrfs_cleanup_ordered_extents() normally needs to skip the
ranges inside the folio, as it will normally be cleaned up by
extent_writepage().
Such split error handling is already problematic in the first place.
What's worse is the folio range skipping itself, which is not taking
subpage cases into consideration at all, it will only skip the range
if the page start >= the range start.
In our case, the page start < the range start, since for subpage cases
we can have delalloc ranges inside the folio but not covering the
folio.
So it doesn't skip the page range at all.
This means all the ordered extents, both [1568K, 1584K) and
[1584K, 1596K) will be marked as IOERR.
And these two ordered extents have no more pending ios, they are marked
finished, and *QUEUED* to be deleted from the io tree.
- extent_writepage() do error cleanup
Call btrfs_mark_ordered_io_finished() for the range [1536K, 1600K).
Although ranges [1568K, 1584K) and [1584K, 1596K) are finished, the
deletion from io tree is async, it may or may not happen at this
time.
If the ranges have not yet been removed, we will do double cleaning on
those ranges, triggering the above ordered extent warnings.
In theory there are other bugs, like the cleanup in extent_writepage()
can cause double accounting on ranges that are submitted asynchronously
(compression for example).
But that's much harder to trigger because normally we do not mix regular
and compression delalloc ranges.
[FIX]
The folio range split is already buggy and not subpage compatible, it
was introduced a long time ago where subpage support was not even considered.
So instead of splitting the ordered extents cleanup into the folio range
and out of folio range, do all the cleanup inside writepage_delalloc().
- Pass @NULL as locked_folio for btrfs_cleanup_ordered_extents() in
btrfs_run_delalloc_range()
- Skip the btrfs_cleanup_ordered_extents() if writepage_delalloc()
failed
So all ordered extents are only cleaned up by
btrfs_run_delalloc_range().
- Handle the ranges that already have ordered extents allocated
If part of the folio already has ordered extent allocated, and
btrfs_run_delalloc_range() failed, we also need to cleanup that range.
Now we have a concentrated error handling for ordered extents during
btrfs_run_delalloc_range().
Fixes: d1051d6ebf ("btrfs: Fix error handling in btrfs_cleanup_ordered_extents")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.15+
Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Rename the macro so it's obvious what it means.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Same pattern in both functions, we really only use index, start_index is
redundant.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
There are only 2 WAIT_* values left for wait parameter, we can encode
this to the function name if the waiting functionality is split.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Last use was in the readahead code that got removed by f26c923860
("btrfs: remove reada infrastructure").
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Another conversion to folio API, use the folio locking directly instead
of back and forth page <-> folio conversions.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The check function pattern is supposed to return true/false, currently
there's only one error code.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Use the folio API, remove page_folio/folio_page conversions.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Continue page to folio updates, sync what the function does with it's
name.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Using the kmem cache freeing directly is clear enough, we don't need to
wrap it. All the users are in the same file.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The simple helper can be inlined, no need for the separate function.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
As extent_writepage() is internal helper we should use our inode type,
so change it from struct inode.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The double underscore naming scheme does not apply here, there's only
only get_extent_map(). As the definition is changed also pass the struct
btrfs_inode.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The function set_page_extent_mapped() is now a simple wrapper so use the
folio helper.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Drop the leading underscores in '__unlock_for_delalloc()' and rename it
to 'unlock_delalloc_folio()'. This also ensures naming parity with
'lock_delalloc_folios()'.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Use the existing define for single sector size.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The subvol_srcu was removed in c75e839414 ("btrfs: kill the
subvol_srcu") years ago.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Commit 449813515d ("block, fs: Restore the per-bio/request data
lifetime fields") restored write-hint support in btrfs. But that is
applicable only for direct IO. This patch supports passing
write-hint for buffered IO from btrfs file system to block layer
by filling bi_write_hint of struct bio in alloc_new_bio().
There's an ongoing discussion which devices can use that,
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240910150200.6589-6-joshi.k@samsung.com,
in SCSI there's support using sd_group_number() and
sd_setup_rw32_cmnd().
The hint goes from the application directly to the block device so it's
up to the application to set up everything properly to utilize the
different hint classes.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240910150200.6589-6-joshi.k@samsung.com
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Jing Xia <j.xia@samsung.com>
[ Add more context and use case. ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
