Consider the fractional bpp while reading the qp values.
v2: Use helpers for fractional, integral bits of bits_per_pixel. (Suraj)
Signed-off-by: Vandita Kulkarni <vandita.kulkarni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Sui Jingfeng <suijingfeng@loongson.cn>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20231110101020.4067342-6-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com
DSC parameter bits_per_pixel is stored in U6.4 format.
The 4 bits represent the fractional part of the bpp.
Currently we use compressed_bpp member of dsc structure to store
only the integral part of the bits_per_pixel.
To store the full bits_per_pixel along with the fractional part,
compressed_bpp is changed to store bpp in U6.4 formats. Intergral
part is retrieved by simply right shifting the member compressed_bpp by 4.
v2:
-Use to_bpp_int, to_bpp_frac_dec, to_bpp_x16 helpers while dealing
with compressed bpp. (Suraj)
-Fix comment styling. (Suraj)
v3:
-Add separate file for 6.4 fixed point helper(Jani, Nikula)
-Add comment for magic values(Suraj)
v4:
-Fix checkpatch warnings caused by renaming(Suraj)
v5:
-Rebase.
-Use existing helpers for conversion of bpp_int to bpp_x16
and vice versa.
Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mitul Golani <mitulkumar.ajitkumar.golani@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Sui Jingfeng <suijingfeng@loongson.cn>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20231110101020.4067342-3-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com
pic_width when written into the PPS register is divided by the no.
of vdsc instances first but the actual variable that we compare it
to does not change i.e vdsc_cfg->pic_width hence when reading the
register back for pic_width it needs to be multiplied by
num_vdsc_instances rather than being divided.
Fixes: 8b70b56917 ("drm/i915/vdsc: Fill the intel_dsc_get_pps_config function")
Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Kumar Borah <chaitanya.kumar.borah@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230911193742.836063-1-suraj.kandpal@intel.com
Register read functions usually return the value instead of passing via
pointer parameters. Return the multiple register verification results
via a pointer parameter, which can also be NULL to skip the extra
checks.
Make the name conform to existing style better while at it.
Cc: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Cc: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/4d08c0f63c4975cc8cd01b0f82845c989bf13dd0.1693933849.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
Register read functions usually return the value instead of passing via
pointer parameters. The calling code becomes easier to read.
Make the name conform to existing style better while at it.
Cc: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Cc: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/89b7d70bb19114ab3ff0e150a4b862d8032f136d.1693933849.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
Make it clear what's the number of vdsc per pipe, and what's the number
of registers to grab. Have intel_dsc_get_pps_reg() return the registers
it knows even if the requested amount is bigger.
Cc: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Cc: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/e2551b52ac0dd2b4ffe18d5e7733fafdc191d68a.1693933849.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
We have setup both the read and write functions so we can
move ahead and fill in all the readout state from PPS register
into the crtc_state so we can send it for comparision.
--v2
-Shorten comment to just PPSX rather than having the whole
"Readout PPSX register" [Jani]
-Remove pps_temp reinitialization as its being initialized in
the read function [Jani]
-Use REG_FIELD_GET to readout certain fields of dsc registers
[Jani]
--v9
-Place the masks at a more appropriate place [Ankit]
Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230828054300.560559-8-suraj.kandpal@intel.com
Now that we have a function that reads any PPS register based
on intel_dsc_pps enum provided lets create a function that can
write on any PPS.
--v2
-Changes need as PPS enum was dropped
-Remove duplicated code in intel_dsc_write_pps_reg [Jani]
--v3
-Use dsc_split instead of num_vdsc_instances [Ankit]
--v5
-Changes to implement the new dsc_reg array variable passing
[Ankit]
--v7
-Pass no of vdsc instances to get_pps_reg [Ankit]
--v8
-No need for dsc_reg dynamic allocation [Jani]
-Change function to void as no return needs to be sent back
--v9
-Send ARRAY_SIZE(dsc_reg) instead of vdsc_per_pipe [Ankit]
Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230828054300.560559-6-suraj.kandpal@intel.com
Add function to read any PPS register based on the
intel_dsc_pps enum provided. Add a function which will call the
new pps read function and place it in crtc state. Only PPS0 and
PPS1 are readout the rest of the registers will be read in upcoming
patches.
--v2
-Changes in read function as PPS enum is removed
-Initialize pps_val as 0 in pps_read func itself [Jani]
-Create a function that gets the required register and call that
in the common read function [Jani]
-Move the drm_WARN_ON one abstraction layer above [Jani]
--v3
-Send both reg values regardless of dsc engine no [Jani]
-Don't use num_vdsc_instances stick to dsc_split field [Ankit]
--v4
-Manipulate the reg values instead of creating MACRO to change
name of pps [Ankit]
--v5
-Read dsc reg values using array rather than individual variables
[Ankit]
-Loop the verification of all dsc engine reads to future proof it
[Ankit]
-Keep the fix me comment in this patch and remove it in later one
where we add other readouts [Ankit]
-Add switch statement that fills in the required registers based on
no of vdsc engines per pipe.
--v7
-Pass no of vdsc instances from read_reg function [Ankit]
-Fix issue where arrays do not get freed on return for read_and_verify
func [Ankit]
--v8
-Simplify reading and verifying of register and remove dynamically
allocated arrays [Jani]
-Remove no_ from no_vdsc_per_pipe and wherever else it applies [Ankit]
--v9
-change variable name to dsc_reg_size rather than vdsc_per_pipe [Ankit]
--v10
-remove switch case as we never enter case1 [Ankit]
--v11
-Add _ prefix for register that are not supposed to be used directly
[Jani]
-Remove REG suffix from register macros [Jani]
-Do not duplicate register read [Jani]
--v12
-Use vdsc_per_pipe rather than array size of dsc_reg [Jani]
Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230828054300.560559-5-suraj.kandpal@intel.com
We have a function that gets us the total of the vdsc engines being
used but not the no. of vdsc instances being used by each pipe.
--v6
-Change function to static
--v7
-Shorten name to intel_dsc_get_vdsc_per_pipe
Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230828054300.560559-4-suraj.kandpal@intel.com
In intel_vdsc_get_config we only read the primary dsc engine register
and not take into account if the other dsc engine is in use and if
both registers have the same value or not this patche fixes that by
adding a check.
--v3
-Remove superfluos new line [Jani]
-Fix register naming [Jani]
--v5
-pps_temp0/pps_temp1 can be assigned where they are used [Ankit]
Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230828054300.560559-3-suraj.kandpal@intel.com
On checking DSC1.1 Errata and DSC 1.2 spec the current formula
we were using was incorrect to calculate first_line_bpg_offset.
The new fixed formula is derived from C model.
--v2
-Use clamp function in linux/minmax.h [Ankit]
--v3
-remove linux/minmax.h header
Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230804083737.3844575-1-suraj.kandpal@intel.com
Remove the FIXME and the code related to it as after verification
it does seem the previous values were typos and no hardware spec
mentions using these particular rc_params.
Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230626130555.2391750-1-suraj.kandpal@intel.com
Some rc_range_parameter calculations were missed for YCbCr420,
add them to calculate_rc_param()
--v2
-take into account the new formula to get bpp_i
--v4
-Fix range_bpg_offset formula for YCbCr420 bpp <= 16 [Ankit]
--v5
-Fix comment and mention use of DSC C Model [Ankit]
Cc: Vandita Kulkarni <vandita.kulkarni@intel.com>
Cc: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Cc: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230710162456.2736949-1-suraj.kandpal@intel.com
Move rc_param calculation for native_420 into calculate_rc_parameter.
second_line_bpg_offset and second_line_offset_adj are both rc params
and it would be better to have these calculated where all the other
rc parameters are calculated.
--v2
-Add the reason for commit in commit message [Jani]
--v3
-Move nsl_second_line_bpg_offset with the other 420 calculation
in calculate_rc_param [Ankit]
--v4
-Fix comment alignment [Ankit]
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230705051502.2568245-2-suraj.kandpal@intel.com
Currently we are using dsc_split and bigjoiner variables for determining
amount of VDSC instances, however that might change in future, if we happen
to have more of those.
So lets pack all that logic into single function for convenience, so that
at least this isn't hardcoded throughout the whole VDSC code.
v2: - s/u8/int/ (Jani Nikula)
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230704131758.14024-2-stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com
The array of rc_parameters contains a mixture of parameters from DSC 1.1
and DSC 1.2 standards. Split these tow configuration arrays in
preparation to adding more configuration data.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230517102807.2181589-7-dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org
Acked-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Stop using an interim structure rc_parameters for storing calculated
params and then setting drm_dsc_config using that structure. Instead put
calculated params into the struct drm_dsc_config directly.
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230517102807.2181589-5-dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org
Move DSC RC tables to DRM DSC helper. No additional code changes
and/or cleanups are a part of this commit, it will be cleaned up in the
followup commits.
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230517102807.2181589-4-dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org
Acked-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
The rc_buf_thresh values are common to all DSC implementations. Move
them to the common helper together with the code to propagate them to
the drm_dsc_config.
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@somainline.org>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230517102807.2181589-3-dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org
Acked-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
After cross-checking DSC models (20150914, 20161212, 20210623) change
values in rc_parameters tables to follow config files present inside
the DSC model. Handle two places, where i915 tables diverged from the
model, by patching the rc values in the code.
Note: I left one case uncorrected, 8bpp/10bpc/range_max_qp[0], because
the table in the VESA DSC 1.1 sets it to 4.
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230517102807.2181589-2-dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org
Add function to check if slice design requirements are being
met as defined in Bspec: 49259 in the section
Slice Design Requirement
--v7
-remove full bspec link [Jani]
-rename intel_dsc_check_slice_design_req to
intel_dsc_slice_dimensions_valid [Jani]
--v8
-fix condition to check if slice width and height are
of two
-fix minimum pixel in slice condition
--v10
-condition should be < rather then >= [Uma]
Cc: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230309062855.393087-7-suraj.kandpal@intel.com
Now that we have laid the groundwork for YUV420 Enablement
we fill up native_420 field in vdsc_cfg and add appropriate
checks wherever required.
---v2
-adding native_422 field as 0 [Vandita]
-filling in second_line_bpg_offset, second_line_offset_adj
and nsl_bpg_offset in vds_cfg when native_420 is true
---v3
-adding display version check to solve igt issue
--v7
-remove is_pipe_dsc check as its always true for D14 [Jani]
--v10
-keep sink capability check [Jani]
-move from !(x == y || w == z) to x !=y && w != z [Jani]
--v11
-avoid native_420 computation if not gen14 [Uma]
--v12
-fix state mismatch issue of compressed_bpp
Cc: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230309062855.393087-6-suraj.kandpal@intel.com
Implementation of VDSC for YCbCr420.
Add QP tables for 8,10,12 BPC from rc_tables.h in intel_qp_tables.c
(Derived from C-Model, which is given along with DSC1.2a Spec from Vesa)
intel_lookup_range_min/max_qp functons need to take into account the
output format. Based on that appropriate qp table need to be chosen.
Other rc_parameters need to be set where currently values for 444 format
is hardcoded in calculate_rc_parameters( ).
vdsc_cfg struct needs to be filled with output format information, where
these are hardcoded for 444 format.
Bspec: 49259
Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Vandita Kulkarni <Vandita.kulkarni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230309062855.393087-5-suraj.kandpal@intel.com
Use HAS_DSC(__i915) wrapper containing runtime info of has_dsc
member. Platforms supporting dsc has this flag enabled; no need of
DISPLAY_VER() check.
Also, simplified intel_dsc_source_support() based on above changes.
Suggested-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Swati Sharma <swati2.sharma@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221110093312.13932-1-swati2.sharma@intel.com
Turns out many of the files that need i915_reg.h get it implicitly via
{display/intel_de.h, gt/intel_context.h} -> i915_trace.h -> i915_irq.h
-> i915_reg.h. Since i915_trace.h doesn't actually need i915_irq.h,
makes sense to drop it, but that requires adding quite a few new
includes all over the place.
Prefer including i915_reg.h where needed instead of adding another
implicit include, because eventually we'll want to split up i915_reg.h
and only include the specific registers at each place.
Also some places actually needed i915_irq.h too.
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/6e78a2e0ac1bffaf5af3b5ccc21dff05e6518cef.1668008071.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
Currently, pic_height of vdsc_cfg structure is being used to calculate
slice_height, before it is set for DP.
So taking out the lines to set pic_height from the helper
intel_dp_dsc_compute_params() to individual encoders, and setting
pic_height, before it is used to calculate slice_height for DP.
Fixes: 5a6d866f8e ("drm/i915: Get slice height before computing rc params")
Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Cc: Vandita Kulkarni <vandita.kulkarni@intel.com>
Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Vandita Kulkarni <vandita.kulkarni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220902103219.1168781-1-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com
DSC is the Display Stream Compression standard for DisplayPort. Move
the DSC code into display/ and split the header into files for protocol
core and DRM helpers. Adapt all users of the code. No functional
changes.
To avoid the proliferation of Kconfig options, DSC is part of DRM's
support for DisplayPort. If necessary, a new option could make DSC an
independent feature.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220421073108.19226-6-tzimmermann@suse.de
Since we now have the bigjoiner_pipes bitmask the boolean
is redundant. Get rid of it.
Also, populating bigjoiner_pipes already during
encoder->compute_config() allows us to use it much earlier
during the state calculation as well. The initial aim is
to use it in intel_crtc_compute_config().
v2: Move the hweight(bigjoiner_pipes) stuff to a later patch
Reviewed-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com> #v1
Reviewed-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com> #v1
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220223131315.18016-12-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Don't populate the read-only arrays on the stack but instead make
them static const and signed 8 bit ints. Also makes the object code a
little smaller. Reformat the statements to clear up checkpatch warning.
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220223120923.239867-1-colin.i.king@gmail.com
Get rid of the inflexible bigjoiner_linked_crtc pointer thing
and just track things as a bitmask of pipes instead. We can
also nuke the bigjoiner_slave boolean as the role of the pipe
can be determined from its position in the bitmask.
It might be possible to nuke the bigjoiner boolean as well
if we make encoder.compute_config() do the bitmask assignment
directly for the master pipe. But for now I left that alone so
that encoer.compute_config() will just flag the state as needing
bigjoiner, and the intel_atomic_check_bigjoiner() is still
responsible for determining the bitmask. But that may have to change
as the encoder may be in the best position to determine how
exactly we should populate the bitmask.
Most places that just looked at the single bigjoiner_linked_crtc
now iterate over the whole bitmask, eliminating the singular
slave pipe assumption.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220203183823.22890-11-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Add display/intel_display_trace.[ch] for defining display
tracepoints. The main goal is to reduce cross-includes between gem and
display. It would be possible split up tracing even further, but that
would lead to more boilerplate.
We end up having to include intel_crtc.h in a few places because it was
pulled in implicitly via intel_de.h -> i915_trace.h -> intel_crtc.h, and
that's no longer the case.
There should be no changes to tracepoints.
v3:
- Rebase
v2:
- Define TRACE_INCLUDE_PATH relative to define_trace.h (Chris)
- Remove useless comments (Ville)
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/7862ad764fbd0748d903c76bc632d3d277874e5b.1638961423.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
The PPS SDP is fed into the transcoder whereas the DSC
block is (or at least can be) per pipe. Let's split these
into two distinct operations in an effort to untagle the
bigjoiner mess where we have two pipes feeding a single
transcoder.
Reviewed-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211022103304.24164-7-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Add a single point of truth for figuring out the primary/secondary crtc
for bigjoiner instead of duplicating the magic pipe +/- 1 in multiple
places.
Also fix the pipe validity checks to properly take non-contiguous pipes
into account. The current checks may theoretically overflow
i915->pipe_to_crtc_mapping[pipe], albeit with a warning, due to fused
off pipes, as INTEL_NUM_PIPES() returns the actual number of pipes on
the platform, and the check is for INTEL_NUM_PIPES() == pipe + 1.
Prefer primary/secondary terminology going forward.
v2:
- Improved abstractions for pipe validity etc.
Fixes: 8a029c113b ("drm/i915/dp: Modify VDSC helpers to configure DSC for Bigjoiner slave")
Fixes: d961eb20ad ("drm/i915/bigjoiner: atomic commit changes for uncompressed joiner")
Cc: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Cc: Vandita Kulkarni <vandita.kulkarni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.dl.navare@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210610090528.20511-1-jani.nikula@intel.com
